英国白人警察赢得歧视案; 由于肤色而未被考虑晋升
White British Cops Win Discrimination Case; Were Not Considered For Promotion Due To Skin-Color

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/white-british-cops-win-discrimination-case-were-not-considered-promotion-due-skin-color

由三名泰晤士河谷警察组成的团队成功赢得了针对雇主的就业法庭诉讼,指控他们因其“英国白人”种族而受到不公平待遇。 在审判期间,一名高级警官被指示在警察部门内促进种族多样性,重点是雇用一名亚裔侦探督察。 尽管拥有丰富的经验,这三名官员仍未能申请此次晋升。 该职位空缺并未公开宣布,也没有进行正式的招聘程序。 职位空缺后,一名级别低于军官、名叫西杜(名字略)的中士被任命担任该职位。 这个人既不像那三名白人警官那样是侦探,也不是督察。 仲裁庭发现,主管官员艾玛·贝利(Emma Baillie)在没有经过适当考虑的情况下做出了任命,行为不审慎。 此外,Baillie 试图通过提及不存在的“BAME 进步计划”来回顾性地证明自己的行为是合理的。 法官裁定,贝利和其他官员仅根据种族背景优先考虑候选人,无视公平做法。 判决认为,招募过程对三名白人警官存在歧视,违反了平等法,构成积极歧视。 这一事件引起了人们对可能滥用平权行动政策的担忧。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

Three Thames Valley Police officers have won an employment tribunal in which they charged they had been disadvantaged by employers for being “white British”.

The Telegraph reports that the tribunal was informed that a superintendent at the police force was tasked with ‘improving diversity’, specifically by seeking to appoint an “Asian” sergeant to the rank of Detective Inspector.

The three officers, who had all been working for the force for between 19-26 years were actively blocked from applying for the position.

The vacancy was never advertised and no competitive employment process was initiated, it was revealed at the tribunal.

A month after the position became available, a Sergeant Sidhu (Forename withheld) was appointed.

This person held a lower rank and wasn’t even an inspector or detective inspector, unlike the three white officers.

The Tribunal noted that the Superintendent (Emma Baillie) had been ordered to “make it happen” by the Deputy Chief Constable and “took the decision without thinking it through.”

It was also revealed that Baillie later tried to “retrospectively justify” the decision, claiming the appointment was made under a “BAME Progression Program which clearly did not exist at the time”.

“Superintendent Baillie and no doubt the deputy chief constable had been warned of the risk of operating such a policy,” the tribunal said.

Employment Judge Robin Postle concluded “The Superintendent made a decision to move Police Sergeant Sidhu into the detective inspector role without any competitive assessment process taking place.“

Postle added, “It went beyond mere encouragement, disadvantaging those officers who did not share Sergeant Sidhu’s protected characteristic of race and who were denied the opportunity to apply for the role.”

“It was not a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. Clearly, Superintendent Baillie was only focused on ‘making it work’ rather than carrying out a balancing exercise,” the judge further noted, adding that the decision “clearly constituted positive discrimination.”

White privilege, right?

*  *  *

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com