特别检察官史密斯要求上诉法院恢复特朗普文件案
Special Counsel Smith Asks Appeals Court To Revive Trump Documents Case

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/special-counsel-smith-asks-appeals-court-revive-trump-documents-case

被任命调查前总统唐纳德·特朗普处理机密文件的特别检察官杰克·史密斯要求美国第十一巡回上诉法院推翻下级法院驳回针对特朗普的案件的决定。 根据8月26日提交的简报,特别检察官的任命和经费是有效的。 地区法院不同意的决定据称违反了最高法院的先例、对相关法律的错误解释以及对历史上总检察长任命特别检察官的考虑不足。 艾琳·坎农 (Aileen Cannon) 法官此前于 7 月裁定,史密斯的任命违反了宪法有关国会通过立法参与官员任命和预算权力的规定。 她的裁决认为史密斯是“下级官员”,需要立法机构事先批准他被任命为特别检察官,但这一批准并未批准。 这引发了人们对司法部使用特别检察官及其运作合法性的担忧。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Sam Dorman via The Epoch Times,

Special counsel Jack Smith has asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit to reverse Judge Aileen Cannon’s order dismissing the Justice Department’s prosecution of former President Donald Trump over his handling of classified documents.

“The Attorney General validly appointed the Special Counsel, who is also properly funded,” the special counsel said in a brief to the appellate court on Aug. 26.

“In ruling otherwise, the district court deviated from binding Supreme Court precedent, misconstrued the statutes that authorized the Special Counsel’s appointment, and took inadequate account of the longstanding history of Attorney General appointments of special counsels.”

Cannon ruled in July that Smith’s appointment as special counsel violated the U.S. Constitution, specifically the appointments and appropriations clauses.

In a 93-page ruling, Cannon wrote that Smith’s prosecution of the former president “breaches two structural cornerstones of our constitutional scheme—the role of Congress in the appointment of constitutional officers, and the role of Congress in authorizing expenditures by law.”

The ruling raised questions about the Justice Department’s use of special counsels.

The judge ruled that Smith was an inferior officer, which requires Congress to authorize the attorney general to appoint him as special counsel, which didn’t happen.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com