Elasticsearch 再次开源
Elasticsearch is open source, again

原始链接: https://www.elastic.co/blog/elasticsearch-is-open-source-again

流行的搜索平台 Elasticsearch 及其配套的由 Elastic 开发的可视化工具 Kibana 将再次被归类为“开源”。 这一决定是由于添加了 Affero 通用公共许可证 (AGPL),该许可证加入了现有许可证弹性许可证 v2 (ELv2) 和服务器端公共许可证 (SSPL)。 此举旨在消除围绕这些工具作为开源项目的地位的任何疑虑,确保全球开发人员之间的不间断协作。 虽然 Elastic 确实在三年前改变了许可模式,但最近的转变解决了人们对亚马逊基于旧版本 Elasticsearch 的单独产品造成的潜在市场混乱的担忧。 新的安排加强了 Elastic 与 AWS 的联系,从获得 AWS 年度合作伙伴奖就可以看出这一点。 目前使用任一工具的用户无需担心任何变化,因为 Elastic 继续支持 ELv2 和 SSPL 以及新引入的 AGPL 选项。 通过采用 AGPL,Elastic 希望为开源生态系统做出积极贡献,旨在提高行业内许可选择的灵活性。 与往常一样,Elastic 仍然致力于为其用户群提供简单性和便利性。

该用户认为,与日常含义相比,“开源”一词的定义过于狭窄,并建议考虑使用替代术语。 然而,助理反驳说,这种现象并非“开源”一词所独有,而是经常出现在专业词汇中,例如技术或科学领域。 用户承认这一点并同意某些专业术语可能需要复杂的解释。 他们承认“开源”已经得到广泛认可,因此非专业人士更容易理解,尽管并不完美。 最后,他们承认,虽然存在替代方案,例如“自由/自由和开源软件”,但这些较长的短语未能获得广泛接受。
相关文章

原文

[D.N.A] Elasticsearch and Kibana can be called Open Source again. It is hard to express how happy this statement makes me. Literally jumping up and down with excitement here. All of us at Elastic are. Open source is in my DNA. It is in Elastic DNA. Being able to call Elasticsearch Open Source again is pure joy.

[LOVE.] The tl;dr is that we will be adding AGPL as another license option next to ELv2 and SSPL in the coming weeks. We never stopped believing and behaving like an open source community after we changed the license. But being able to use the term Open Source, by using AGPL, an OSI approved license, removes any questions, or fud, people might have.

[Not Like Us] We never stopped believing in Open Source at Elastic. I never stopped believing in Open Source. I’m going on 25 years and counting as a true believer. So why the change 3 years ago? We had issues with AWS and the market confusion their offering was causing. So after trying all the other options we could think of, we changed the license, knowing it would result in a fork of Elasticsearch with a different name and a different trajectory. It’s a long story.

[Like That] The good news is that while it was painful, it worked. 3 years later, Amazon is fully invested in their fork, the market confusion has been (mostly) resolved, and our partnership with AWS is stronger than ever. We were even named AWS partner of the year. I had always hoped that enough time would pass that we could feel safe to get back to being an Open Source project - and it finally has.

[All The Stars] We want to make the life of our users as simple as possible. We have people that really like ELv2 (a BSD inspired license). We have people that have SSPL approved (through MongoDB using it). Which is why we are simply adding another option, and not removing anything. If you already use and enjoy Elasticsearch, please carry on, nothing changed. For others, you now have the option to choose AGPL as well.

[LOYALTY.] We chose AGPL, vs another license, because we hope our work with OSI will help to have more options in the Open Source licensing world. And it seems like another OSI approved license will rhyme with SSPL and/or AGPL. Heck, maybe AGPL is enough for infrastructure software like us with how things have progressed since we had to change the license (for example, Grafana who moved to it from Apache2). We are committed to figure it out.

[euphoria] I am so happy to be able to call Elasticsearch Open Source again.

[Alright] With any change, there can be confusion, and, of course, there can be trolls. (Aren’t there always trolls?) Let’s have some fun and try to answer some of these.. Here are some I can imagine, but let’s keep adding to this.

  • “Changing the license was a mistake, and Elastic now backtracks from it”. We removed a lot of market confusion when we changed our license 3 years ago. And because of our actions, a lot has changed. It’s an entirely different landscape now. We aren’t living in the past. We want to build a better future for our users. It’s because we took action then, that we are in a position to take action now.
  • “AGPL is not true open source, license X is”: AGPL is an OSI approved license, and it's a widely adopted one. For example, MongoDB used to be AGPL and Grafana is AGPL. It shows that AGPL doesn’t affect usage or popularity. We chose AGPL because we believe it’s the best way to start to pave a path, with OSI, towards more Open Source in the world, not less.
  • “Elastic changes the license because they are not doing well” - I will start by saying that I am as excited today as ever about the future of Elastic. I am tremendously proud of our products and our team's execution. We shipped Stateless Elasticsearch, ES|QL, and tons of vector database/hybrid search improvements for GenAI use cases. We are leaning heavily into OTel in logging and Observability. And our SIEM product in Security keeps adding amazing features and it's one of the fastest growing in the market. Users' response has been humbling. The stock market will have its ups and downs. What I can assure you, is that we are always thinking long term, and this change is part of it.

If we see more, we will add them above to hopefully reduce confusion.

[HUMBLE.] It’s so exciting to build for the future. Elasticsearch is back to being Open Source. Yay! What a wonderful thing to say. What a wonderful day.

Forever :elasticheart: elasticheart.svg Open Source
Shay

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com