加州禁止选民身份证法案通过立法机关,等待纽森签署
California Bill Banning Voter ID Passes Legislature, Awaits Newsom's Signature

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/california-bill-banning-voter-id-passes-legislature-awaits-newsoms-signature

加州议会批准了一项法案,禁止地方政府在选举期间实施选民身份识别要求。 这项名为 SB 1174 的法案目前正在等待州长加文·纽瑟姆 (Gavin Newsom) 的批准或否决。 该立法旨在防止全州投票规定不一致,特别是解决对“边缘阴谋论”的担忧。 支持者认为,选民身份要求制造了不必要的障碍,却无法防止选民欺诈。 目前,加州选民仅在某些情况下才需要提供身份证明,例如在登记时未能提交驾驶执照号码或社会安全号码的最后四位数字。 如果获得通过,该法案可能会推翻奥兰治县沿海城市亨廷顿海滩最近做出的一项决定,该决定通过章程修正案允许从 2026 年开始要求选民提供身份证件。 亨廷顿海滩市律师迈克尔·盖茨 (Michael Gates) 将 SB 1174 视为一项出于政治动机的举措,反对该市新制定的政策。 与此同时,亨廷顿海滩市长格雷西·范德马克认为,由于对亲自投票站的不安全感,居民更喜欢采取更严格的选民身份识别措施。 围绕该法案的辩论仍在继续。

相关文章

原文

A bill in California that would ban local governments from requiring voter ID in elections passed the state's far-left assembly, and how awaits Governor Gavin Newsom's approval or veto.

State Sen. Dave Min (D-Irvine) speaks at a press conference in Huntington Beach, Calif., on Oct. 6, 2021. John Fredricks/The Epoch Times

The measure would ban local governments such as Huntington Beach - where the City Council was just given voter approval to impose such a requirement - from requiring voters to prove their identity, and passes jurisdiction for such laws to the state.

"I have repeatedly told the Huntington Beach City Council members pushing this issue that if they were to produce any evidence of widespread voter fraud, I would lead efforts to change California’s voter eligibility rules. They have not produced any such evidence," said Irving Democrat. Sen. Dave Min, whose Senate Bill 1174 passed the assembly in a 57-16 vote on Aug. 27.

The bill was approved 30-8 in the state Senate in May.

According to Min, the bill would protect against a "patchwork of varying election requirements" throughout the Golden State - blocking all cities from requiring voters to present a government-issued ID to vote. The ban also includes charter cities.

"We cannot have 100 different charter cities making up 100 different sets of voting rules, based on fringe conspiracy theories," said Min, referring to those questioning the results of the 2020 election.

As the Epoch Times notes further, in a May 21 Senate floor hearing, Min said SB 1174 would create a statewide standard that prevents cities from enacting their own policies, which he said could create inequality.

SB 1174 would try to address this matter and ensure that local jurisdictions cannot impose their own voter ID requirements to try to engage in culture wars and try to disenfranchise voters,” he said.

In a recent Assembly Local Government bill analysis, Min argued that voter ID requirements only create barriers for voters but don’t protect against fraud, as voters already must verify their identity when they register.

Healthy democracies rely on robust access to the polls. An overwhelming body of evidence proves that voter ID laws only subvert voter turnout and create barriers to law-abiding voters,” he said.

He said the state already automatically recounts some ballots, does signature verification checks, and allows voters to track their ballots.

“We will not concede to ploys of voter fraud while an overwhelming body of evidence proves our elections are safe, secure, and above board,” he said.

Voters in California are required to show identification only if they didn’t provide a driver’s license number or the last four digits of their Social Security number when registering, but the secretary of state also accepts credit or debit cards, student IDs, or an ID from a commercial establishment.

For mail-in ballots, those without proper identification are treated as provisional ballots per existing state law and election officials are supposed to request proof before counting them. In the 2022 statewide general election, 660 ballots were rejected because of identification issues.

During the March 5 primary election, voters in Huntington Beach, a charter city in Orange County, approved a charter amendment to allow voter ID requirements in city elections starting in 2026.

But according to Min, if SB 1174  is signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom, the bill would nullify the city’s Measure A before it takes effect.

Huntington Beach City Attorney Michael Gates told The Epoch Times in a recent interview that Min’s bill is “pure political symbolism” in response to the city’s recently passed measure.

He said as a charter city, under Article XI, Section 5 (b) of the California Constitution, Huntington Beach has a right to have voter ID, and the state will lose any legal challenges it brings.

“The state is running headlong into another legal clash, which it will lose miserably.  Huntington Beach has it right, the state has it completely wrong. And, all Californians want election integrity.  It’s common sense,” he said in a text message to The Epoch Times.

According to Huntington Beach Mayor Gracey Van Der Mark, residents have said they would feel more secure if IDs are checked at in-person polling stations.

We put it out there on the ballot, they said we want this and the state is doing everything within their power to stop us from honoring what the voters have been asking us for,” she told The Epoch Times in a May interview when Min’s bill first cleared the Senate.

California is one of 15 states that doesn’t ask for photo ID at the ballot box, according to lawmakers.

Newsom has until Sept. 30 to sign or veto the bill.

Travis Gillmore contributed to this report.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com