“矛盾重重”的法官裁定特朗普在纽约“封口费”案中没有豁免权
"Deeply Conflicted" Judge Rules Trump Doesn't Have Immunity In New York 'Hush Money' Case

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/judge-rules-trump-doesnt-have-immunity-new-york-hush-money-case

候任总统特朗普在“封口费”案中提出的豁免请求被纽约法官驳回。法官裁定,这些与非官方行为有关的指控不受豁免权保护。在此之前,最高法院做出了一项裁决,重申了总统对官方行为的豁免权。检方辩称,特朗普审判中提供的任何证据都没有受到保护,而特朗普的律师则反驳道。法官同意检方的观点,认为没有证据属于豁免权。特朗普还辩称,他的当选应该驳回此案,但法官尚未就此事做出裁决。此外,特朗普还指控陪审员有不当行为,但法官尚未公开。

相关文章

原文

President-elect Donald Trump does not have immunity in the so-called “hush money” case in New York, Judge Juan Merchan ruled in a decision on Dec. 16.

The conduct described by the 34 felony counts of which Trump was convicted earlier this year is related “entirely to unofficial conduct entitled to no immunity protections,” Merchan wrote.

As Joseph Lord reports for The Epoch Times, the decision, coming in the wake of Trump’s sweeping victory in the 2024 presidential election, is tied to a U.S. Supreme Court decision earlier this year that reaffirmed the longstanding precedent that official presidential conduct enjoys “presumptive immunity” from criminal prosecution.

The Supreme Court’s decision forced Merchan to determine whether the charges were presumptively immune under the law.

Trump’s attorneys contended that New York prosecutors introduced evidence during his seven-week trial that was protected by the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity doctrine.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg (D) urged the judge to reject Trump’s arguments, arguing that no evidence placed before the jury was protected, and even if it was, it paled in comparison to “other overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt.”

Merchan agreed, finding that none of the challenged evidence was protected.

Even if immunity did extend to the evidence in question, Merchan wrote he “would still find that the People’s use of these acts as evidence of the decidedly personal acts of falsifying business records poses no danger of intrusion on the authority and function of the Executive Branch, a conclusion amply supported by non-motive-related evidence.”

The Hill reports that Trump has separately argued that his White House victory compels the dismissal of the jury’s verdict and the case in its entirety.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg (D) has pushed back, instead laying out alternatives like freezing the proceedings during Trump’s term.

The judge has yet to rule on that matter.

“Today’s decision by deeply conflicted, acting Justice Merchan in the Manhattan DA Witch Hunt is a direct violation of the Supreme Court’s decision on immunity, and other longstanding jurisprudence,” Steven Cheung, Trump’s spokesperson and incoming White House communications director, said in a statement.

In a separate letter, Merchan revealed that Trump also sent a Dec. 3 letter alleging juror misconduct. The judge provided sparse details but indicated the issue would be made public with redactions.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com