法院否认苹果要求干预Google搜索垄断案件
Court Denies Apple's Request To Intervene In Google Search Monopoly Case

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/court-denies-apples-request-intervene-google-search-monopoly-case

苹果公司试图干预Google搜索引擎垄断案件已被地方法院拒绝。法院拒绝延迟补救程序,与指责Google反竞争实践的原告坐落。 苹果公司声称此举威胁到与Google的合同,其中包括以Google为设备上的默认搜索引擎的协议。但是,法院认为苹果的动议不合时宜,并拒绝了其保留诉讼的要求。 该案目前处于补救阶段,正在考虑使用Google垄断的潜在解决方案。拟议的补救措施包括强迫Google剥离其Chrome浏览器,政府认为这加强了其主导地位。 谷歌反对这些建议,理由是安全和隐私问题以及对其在人工智能投资的潜在损害。案件的结果可能会对科技行业和搜索引擎市场产生重大影响。


原文

Authored by Naveen Athrappully via The Epoch Times,

Apple’s attempt to intervene in litigation related to Google’s search engine monopoly was denied by a district court on Sunday when a judge refused to stay the remedial proceedings in the case.

Back in October 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and a coalition of state attorneys filed a case against Google, accusing the tech company of engaging in anti-competitive practices.

Google was accused of establishing exclusive agreements with browser developers, mobile device manufacturers, and wireless carriers which prohibited them from pre-installing rival search engines. This resulted in most U.S. devices coming preloaded with Google search, negatively affecting competitors in the market.

In August 2024, Judge Amit Mehta from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia sided with the plaintiffs, ruling that Google violated antitrust laws.

“Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to maintain its monopoly,” he wrote, saying that the default search engine setting “is extremely valuable real estate.”

A hearing on remedies in the case was scheduled for April 2025.

In December, Apple filed a motion to intervene as a defendant in the case, aiming to take part in the remedial phase of the litigation. However, the motion was denied by Mehta, who called the request “untimely.”

Apple then filed an emergency motion seeking to stay the remedial proceedings pending its appeal of Mehta’s order denying the intervention request. On Feb. 2, Mehta denied the stay request as well.

“First, Apple has not established a likelihood of success on the merits” for the stay, Mehta wrote.

The company also failed to show it stands to suffer “irreparable harm absent a stay,” he said.

“Because Apple has not satisfied the ‘stringent requirements’ for obtaining the ‘extraordinary relief’ of a stay pending appeal, its motion is denied.”

Apple claims the December motion was filed to protect the company’s existing contract with Google and its ability to enter into future contracts with the search engine giant.

Google pays the company to keep its search engine default on Apple’s Safari mobile and desktop browsers, according to a court document from the August 2024 monopoly decision.

“In 2022, Google’s revenue share payment to Apple was an estimated $20 billion,” said the document.

“This is nearly double the payment made in 2020, which was then equivalent to 17.5 percent of Apple’s operating profit.”

Meanwhile, a potential breakup of Google’s business could be on the cards during the remedy phase of the litigation.

In November, the DOJ together with 38 states and territories outlined a proposed remedy that would force Google to divest its Chrome browser.

Regulators argued that Google uses the browser to reinforce its monopoly.

At the time, the government was reportedly looking at potential divestiture of Google’s Android operating system.

Google opposed these suggestions, saying the forced sale of Chrome and Android would “endanger the security and privacy of millions of Americans, and undermine the quality of products people love.”

The move may end up chilling the company’s investment in artificial intelligence, it said.

The Epoch Times reached out to Google and Apple for comment on the recent ruling.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com