上诉法院拒绝解除博阿斯伯格法官对特朗普驱逐令的禁令。
Appeals Court Refuses To Lift Judge Boasberg's Block On Trump Deportations

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/appeals-court-refuses-lift-judge-boasbergs-block-trump-deportations

美国哥伦比亚特区巡回上诉法院的分裂裁决驳回了特朗普政府的请求,该请求试图阻止下级法院的裁决。下级法院的裁决阻止了使用《敌国人法》驱逐涉嫌是委内瑞拉帮派成员的外国人。政府辩称,这项阻止侵犯了总统在国家安全方面的权力。多数法官亨德森和米莱特强调,原告可能面临被驱逐到他们并非原籍国的风险,并妨碍其法律追索权,从而遭受损害。沃克法官持异议,认为下级法院的命令威胁到与外国的国家安全谈判。共和党人批评下级法院法官博阿斯伯格越权。特朗普政府现在可以向最高法院上诉,同时案件在下级法院继续审理。


原文

With a 2-1 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has denied President Donald Trump’s request to halt US District Judge James Boasberg's decision that blocked his proclamation applying the Alien Enemies Act to support deportations of suspected members of a Venezuelan gang.

The Justice Department had urged the three-judge panel on the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to immediately block Boasberg’s order, casting it as an intrusion on the president’s executive authority over national security.

Judges Karen Henderson and Patricia Millett opposed the administration’s request while Judge Justin Walker dissented.

In a concurrence, Henderson said that:

“the Executive’s burdens are comparatively modest compared to the plaintiffs’. Lifting the injunctions risks exiling plaintiffs to a land that is not their country of origin.”

Millett, meanwhile, praised the district court’s handling of the case and said:

“there is neither jurisdiction nor reason for this court to interfere at this very preliminary stage or to allow the government to singlehandedly moot the Plaintiffs’ claims by immediately removing them beyond the reach of their lawyers or the court.”

Walker’s dissent stated that:

“the government has ... shown that the district court’s orders threaten irreparable harm to delicate negotiations with foreign powers on matters concerning national security.”

Republicans have criticized Boasberg as allegedly overstepping his power by questioning President Donald Trump's national security authority.

The Trump administration could now seek emergency review from the Supreme Court, but the case is meanwhile progressing in Boasberg’s court.

Loading...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com