不使用赤道仪进行天文摄影是否可能?
Is Astrophotography Without Tracking Possible? (2022)

原始链接: https://astroimagery.com/astrophotography/heres-how-to-do-astrophotography-without-tracking/

无需星轨追踪器也能进行天文摄影,尤其适合初学者。虽然星轨追踪器可以补偿地球自转,从而允许对暗弱的深空天体进行更长时间的曝光,但你仍然可以使用坚固的三脚架和广角镜头(约17-24mm)拍摄令人印象深刻的图像。 关键在于使用较短的曝光时间(15-30秒)以避免出现星轨。像银河系这样明亮且相对静止的目标是理想的选择。“500法则”(500除以焦距)可以帮助你计算出在出现星轨之前最大的曝光时间。堆栈数百甚至数千张这样的短曝光图像可以创造出令人惊艳的效果。 建议使用单反相机,轻便的碳纤维三脚架是保持稳定性的理想选择。虽然一些望远镜可以选择手动追踪,但在不使用追踪器进行拍摄时,最好还是使用广视野单反相机和镜头,这样更实用。

Hacker News上的一篇讨论围绕着无赤道仪追踪的星空摄影的可行性展开。原文指出,对于广角镜头(<20mm),无需追踪的星空摄影是可行的,因为传感器感光度提高,镜头光圈更大,允许使用更短的曝光时间。 讨论探讨了其中的权衡。叠加多张短曝光照片可以弥补缺乏追踪的不足,但前景元素(如树木)与天空的对齐是一个挑战。传统的深空摄影需要追踪,但由于网上 readily available 的图像和设备成本,其吸引力正在下降。 文章提出了替代方案,例如使用漂移扫描CCD、利用计算方法对叠加的短曝光照片进行反卷积以及幸运成像法,利用快速曝光捕捉良好的大气条件。文中还指出,只要足够稳定,多布森式反射望远镜等也可以用于无追踪的星空摄影,尽管 alt-az 架的安装方式会导致图像旋转。
相关文章
  • (评论) 2024-04-30
  • (评论) 2025-04-19
  • (评论) 2025-04-10
  • 梅西耶马拉松 2025-04-10
  • (评论) 2025-04-05

  • 原文


    Astrophotography without tracking is absolutely possible and can produce stunning results with the right techniques. By choosing bright and stationary targets like the Milky Way, using a sturdy tripod, and applying methods like the 500 Rule, you can capture breathtaking night sky photos without the need for expensive tracking equipment. This guide will walk you through everything you need to know to master astrophotography without tracking, even as a beginner.

    You can do astrophotography without a star tracker by attaching a DSLR camera to a sturdy tripod1. This will limit the length of your exposures to 15-20 seconds. With a lens of 17–24mm, stacking hundreds of photos will create a good image of the Milky Way. Deep Sky targets need bigger lenses and shorter subs.

    If you want to take amazing photos of the night sky without tracking, you need an astrophotography DSLR camera with a wide-angle lens. Check out this Canon EOS Rebel T7 DSLR Camera with 18-55mm Lens (shop now at Amazon) and see the difference.

    We do need to look into this question much deeper because there are many variables that can make astrophotography harder without a star tracker mount. There is a lot more to answering this entirely, so stick with me. This page is filled not only with what you need to know but also with what I have learned through my own experience and research into this question of tracking.

    Why Might We Use Tracking?

    The reason we need a star tracker mount is that astronomical objects in the sky are moving, generally from east to west, depending on where in the sky the object or star is within our solar system. This movement occurs because our planet is rotating. In the Northern Hemisphere, where I live, stars and other objects in the sky seem to rotate around a point near Polaris, the North Star which we can also call the Polar Axis.

    In order to counteract the rotation of the stars, we need to use a star tracker mount that follows the movement of the stars and moves in the opposite direction to keep the object in the centre of the field of view

    telescope with az-alt mount tracking
    Telescope, DSLR and AZ-ALT tracking mount

    Another reason we use a star tracker mount is to enable us to take long exposures to photograph faint objects in the sky and capture their fine details. Without a star tracker, we will get star trails and blurry images with less detail. Most telescopes, but not all, are sold with a tracking mount, but you can also buy a portable star tracker such as the Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer.

    • Includes counterweight, CW bar, tripod, and pier extension
    • Goto system
    • Lightweight
    • Great product!

    As an Amazon associate I earn a small commission, thanks for your support!

    Astrophotography without tracking is possible, but then we are limited to exposures no longer than about 30 seconds.

    My research into this revealed that I could take up to 20-second exposures with a 17 or 24-mm lens on my astrophotography DSLR, a Canon 600D, with no star tracker as I attempted to image the Milky Way, resulting in less noise. This was possible because my target was generally high in the sky. I couldn’t see any trailing in the stars despite not using a tracker mount.

    In March 2022, I went to Bali and experimented with astrophotography using a 50mm focal length lens and a DSLR with a tripod to photograph the Orion Nebula and Horsehead Nebula. I took 435 5-second exposures. Although the picture came out brilliantly on close inspection when zoomed in, the stars were trailing slightly even after 5 seconds of exposure time!

    Astrophotography without tracking: Orion Nebula and Horsehead
    Orion Nebula shot by Karl Perera in Bali 435 x 5 sec.

    When I photographed these two objects, I noticed they were low on the horizon and eventually heading towards setting. This may have been a reason why even 5 seconds of astrophotography without tracking was still causing small amounts of star trailing. The 500 rule explains how long we can expose without star trails.

    What is your Astrophotography Target?

    Whether or not you can image the night sky without a star tracker depends on your target. Some targets, such as deep sky objects such as galaxies and nebulae, are so far away that they are extremely faint, so hours of long exposure times are usually necessary. For extremely difficult-to-image targets, it is best to use longer exposures in the minutes to get a quality image, but you can image these with much shorter untracked images if you take hundreds or even thousands of photos.

    The target mentioned above, the Orion nebula, is very bright and not so far away, so short exposures can work. So to capture these kinds of bright targets, you do not need to use tracking.

    Galaxies, apart from Andromeda, which is both massive and can be seen with the naked eye in dark skies, need longer exposures of one minute or more and several hours of exposure.

    A Helpful Video about untracked astrophotography imaging is this one by Nico Carver:

    联系我们 contact @ memedata.com