“抵制Spotify”:艺术家和乐迷自发发起的退出该应用运动
'Death to Spotify': the DIY movement to get artists and fans to quit the app

原始链接: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/oct/12/spotify-boycott-artists

一个挑战Spotify在音乐产业主导地位的运动本月在旧金山的一系列售罄的“抵制Spotify”演讲中获得了势头。该运动受到Liz Pelly的批判性书籍《情绪机器》的启发,该书认为Spotify贬低了艺术家并推广平庸音乐,活动探讨了算法收听和不公平版税做法的替代方案。 讨论会汇集了独立唱片公司、广播电台和DJ团体的代表,吸引了国际关注,并引发了全球范围内类似活动的计划。该运动建立在最近的艺术家抵制浪潮之上——包括Massive Attack和King Gizzard & the Lizard Wizard——抗议Spotify的低支付,以及最近其创始人对军事人工智能的投资。 虽然泰勒·斯威夫特和汤姆·约克等大牌艺术家过去的抵制活动都只是暂时的,但组织者认为这股浪潮感觉不同,是由小型艺术家质疑Spotify的价值所驱动的。他们提倡听众积极在平台之外寻找音乐,通过Bandcamp等平台直接支持艺术家,并优先考虑集体行动,例如音乐家和相关工人的联盟争取更公平的支付和企业责任。最终目标不一定是消除Spotify,而是鼓励有意识的音乐消费并抵制文化同质化。

一场关于Hacker News的讨论,围绕着《卫报》一篇关于“DIY运动”的文章展开,该运动呼吁艺术家和粉丝因低额报酬而离开Spotify。 许多人同意Spotify的补偿不足,但也有人认为责备对象错了。 一位评论员建议艺术家可以直接拒绝在Spotify上架,从源头上解决问题——他们的合同和权利所有权。 另一些人指出Spotify已经将70%的收入分配给权利持有人,质疑任何报酬是否能让批评者满意。 对话还涉及超级明星收入与小型艺术家收入之间的差距,认为Spotify将财富向上转移。 最后一条评论批评了原文中使用的语言,同时也认为用户应该为Spotify的成功负责,却没有更早地提出抗议。这场辩论凸显了流媒体服务、艺术家和听众之间复杂的关系。
相关文章

原文

This month, indie musicians in San Francisco gathered for a series of talks called Death to Spotify, where attenders explored “what it means to decentralize music discovery, production and listening from capitalist economies”.

The events, held at Bathers library, featured speakers from indie station KEXP, labels Cherub Dream Records and Dandy Boy Records, and DJ collectives No Bias and Amor Digital. What began as a small run of talks quickly sold out and drew international interest. People as far away as Barcelona and Bengaluru emailed the organizers asking how to host similar events.

A Death to Spotify event at Bathers library in San Francisco, California, on 23 September. Photograph: Denise Heredia

The talks come as the global movement against Spotify edges into the mainstream. In January, music journalist Liz Pelly released Mood Machine, a critical history arguing the streaming company has ruined the industry and turned listeners into “passive, uninspired consumers”. Spotify’s model, she writes, depends on paying artists a pittance – less still if they agree to be “playlisted” on its Discovery mode, which rewards the kind of bland, coffee-shop muzak that fades neatly into the background.

Artists have long complained about paltry payouts, but this summer the criticism became personal, targeting Spotify’s billionaire co-founder Daniel Ek for his investment in Helsing, a German firm developing AI for military tech. Groups including Massive Attack, King Gizzard & the Lizard Wizard, Deerhoof and Hotline TNT pulled their music from the service in protest. (Spotify has stressed that “Spotify and Helsing are two separate companies”.)

Mood Machine: the Rise of Spotify and the Costs of the Perfect Playlist by Liz Pelly. Photograph: Hodder

In Oakland, California, Stephanie Dukich read Mood Machine, heard about the boycotts, and was inspired.

Dukich, who investigates complaints against the city’s police, was part of a reading group about digital media at Bathers library. Though she is not a musician, Dukich describes herself, along with her friend and art gallery worker Manasa Karthikeyan, as “really into sound”.

She and Karthikeyan decided to start similar conversations. “Spotify is enmeshed in how we engage with music,” Dukich says. “We thought it would be great to talk about our relationship to streaming – what it means to actually take our files off and learn how to do that together.” Death to Spotify was born.

The goal, in short, was “down with algorithmic listening, down with royalty theft, down with AI-generated music”.

Karthikeyan says the responsibility of quitting Spotify lies as much with listeners as artists. “You have to accept that you won’t have instant access to everything,” she says. “That makes you think harder about what you support.”

But will either musicians or listeners actually have the nerve to actually boycott the app longterm?

Several famous musicians have pulled their catalogues from Spotify with big, headline-grabbing announcements over the years, only to quietly come crawling back to the platform after some time. One of the app’s most popular artists, Taylor Swift, boycotted the service for three years in protest of its unfair payment practices but returned in 2017. Radiohead’s frontman. Thom Yorke, removed some his solo projects for the same reason in 2013, calling Spotify “the last desperate fart of a dying corpse”; he later put them back.

Neil Young and Joni Mitchell left the app in 2022, citing the company’s exclusive deal with anti-vax podcast host Joe Rogan; both Canadian singer-songwriters contracted polio as children in the 1950s. They, too, later restored their catalogues on Spotify.

Eric Drott, a professor of music at the University of Texas at Austin, says the new wave of boycotts feels different. “These acts are less famous. For years, artists knew streaming wouldn’t make them rich but needed the visibility. Now there’s so much music out there, people are questioning whether it’s doing much for them.”

Will Anderson, frontman of Hotline TNT, says there’s “a 0% chance” his band will return. “It doesn’t make sense for true music lovers to be on there,” he says. “Spotify’s end game is for you not to think about what’s playing.” When the band sold their new record Raspberry Moon directly through Bandcamp and a 24-hour Twitch stream, they sold hundreds of copies and “generated thousands of dollars”.

Manasa Karthikeyan (left) and Stephanie Dukich. Photograph: Eva Tuff

Others such as pop-rock songwriter Caroline Rose are experimenting too. Her album Year of the Slug came out only on vinyl and Bandcamp, inspired by Cindy Lee’s Diamond Jubilee, which was initially available only on YouTube and the filesharing site Mega. “I find it pretty lame that we put our heart and soul into something and then just put it online for free,” Rose says.

Rose is a member of the Union of Musicians and Allied Workers (UMAW), an advocacy group formed at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic to protect music workers. Joey DeFrancesco, a member of the punk rock band Downtown Boys and co-founder of UMAW, says the group “unequivocally supports artists taking agency, holding corporations accountable, and making splashes [such as taking music off Spotify] to push back at the company”. At the same time, DeFrancesco says, that kind of individualized boycotting has its “limits”.

“What we try to do in the labor movement and at UMAW is to act collectively,” he adds. Examples include UMAW’s successful campaign (alongside the Austin for Palestine Coalition) to pressure the music festival South by Southwest to drop the US army and weapons manufacturers as sponsors for the 2025 event, and the Living Wages for Musicians Act, sponsored by representative Rashina Tlaib, a bill that would regulate Spotify payouts to artists.

The Death to Spotify organizers say their goal is not necessarily to shut the app down. “We just want everyone to think a little bit harder about the ways they listen to music,” Karthikeyan says. “It just flattens culture at its core if we only stick to this algorithmically built comfort zone.”

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com