Facebook允许在招聘广告中进行性别歧视,违反欧洲人权规定。
Facebook enables gender discrimination in job ads, European human rights rules

原始链接: https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/28/tech/facebook-gender-discrimination-europe-ruling-asequals-intl

欧洲人权机构裁定,脸书的算法在招聘广告投放中存在性别偏见,向女性展示“通常为女性”的职位,向男性展示“通常为男性”的职位——强化了有害的刻板印象。这一决定源于CNN的“As Equals”调查和非营利组织“Global Witness”的调查,揭示了欧洲(包括荷兰、法国和印度)普遍存在的类似偏见。 荷兰人权研究所发现,Meta未能证明其算法不存在歧视,必须对其进行修改以防止进一步的偏见。虽然裁决不具有法律约束力,但可能导致罚款或算法修改。Meta对调查结果表示异议,但此前曾表示已对招聘广告应用了定向限制,尽管批评人士认为这些限制不足。 此案凸显了人们对算法问责制日益增长的担忧,以及反歧视法律对科技公司的适用性。活动人士认为这是确保维护数字权利的关键一步,尤其是在Meta最近缩减了其多元化和包容性项目,引发了人们对在线保护弱势群体进一步的担忧。

一份最新报告指出,Facebook(Meta)通过其算法在招聘广告中助长性别歧视。荷兰人权研究所发现,该算法在多个国家(包括荷兰、法国和印度)向女性展示“通常为女性”的职业,向男性展示“通常为男性”的职业——例如向男性展示机械师,向女性展示学前教师。 这引发了人权组织的投诉,他们指责该算法强化了有害的性别刻板印象。然而,一位Hacker News的评论员反驳了解决此问题的合法性,认为这些定向广告不会造成实际损害,甚至建议修改反歧视法律以*允许*这种做法。其他评论员对这一观点提出了质疑。 这场讨论源于CNN的一篇文章,该文章详细介绍了这些发现以及Meta监控和调整其算法以防止此类偏见所承担的责任。
相关文章

原文

Editor’s Note: This story, originally published in February 2025, is part of ‘Systems Error,’ a series by CNN’s As Equals, investigating how your gender shapes your life online. For information about how CNN As Equals is funded and more, check out our FAQs.

Update: In a separate ruling, in October 2025, the French equalities regulator said Meta’s Facebook algorithm breached France’s anti-discrimination law by displaying different job advertisements to men and women. The independent watchdog said Meta must ensure its ads are non-discriminatory and report back within three months. Meta has said it disagrees with the ruling and is assessing its options.

A European human rights body has ruled that Facebook’s algorithm shows gender bias when promoting job advertisements, marking what activists say is a crucial step in holding big tech companies accountable for the design of their platforms.

The Netherlands Institute for Human Rights said in a February 18 decision that Facebook’s algorithm reinforced gender stereotypes by mainly showing “typically female professions” to female Facebook users in the Netherlands and that Meta (META), the social platform’s owner, should have monitored and adjusted its algorithm to prevent that.

The Institute’s decision follows CNN As Equals reporting revealing that Facebook users in Europe were missing out on job opportunities due to gender bias.

The 2023 article was based on findings shared with CNN by international non-profit Global Witness, which investigated Facebook’s job ads and found that ads in the Netherlands and five other countries often targeted users based on historical gender stereotypes.

For example, ads for mechanic positions were predominantly shown to men, while those for preschool teacher roles were primarily directed to women. Global Witness said its experiments in the Netherlands, France, India, Ireland, the United Kingdom and South Africa demonstrated that the algorithm perpetuated similar biases around the world. The non-profit’s investigation led to four complaints from the Dutch human rights group Bureau Clara Wichmann and the French organization Fondation des Femmes.

The Netherlands Institute for Human Rights said in its February ruling that Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd., which manages Facebook ads in Europe, failed to demonstrate that its advertising algorithm does not engage in prohibited gender discrimination. The Dutch body said Facebook must revise its advertising algorithm to prevent further discrimination.

The European Union has several directives that prohibit discrimination based on gender, including in online advertising.

The Institute’s ruling added that “Meta Ireland has acknowledged that the gender data point can be part of the algorithm. Meta Ireland has not refuted that this data point can promote stereotyping via the algorithm.”

A Meta spokesperson told CNN that it would not be commenting on the matter.

Meta spokesperson Ashley Settle previously told CNN that the company applies “targeting restrictions to advertisers when setting up campaigns for employment, as well as housing and credit ads.” Those audience targeting restrictions are in place in the United States, Canada and more than 40 European countries and territories, including France and the Netherlands, according to Meta.

“We do not allow advertisers to target these ads based on gender,” Settle said in a 2023 statement. “We continue to work with stakeholders and experts across academia, human rights groups and other disciplines on the best ways to study and address algorithmic fairness.” Meta did not respond to questions from CNN at the time about how the algorithm that runs its ad system is trained. In a 2020 blog post about its ad delivery system, Facebook said ads are shown to users based on a variety of factors, including “behavior on and off” the platform.

Berty Bannor of Bureau Clara Wichmann celebrated the Dutch institute’s decision, telling CNN that the ruling was significant.

“Today is a great day for Dutch Facebook users, who have an accessible mechanism to hold multinational tech companies such as Meta accountable and ensure the rights they enjoy offline are upheld in the digital space,” Bannor said.

“I see this as a first step in showing that anti-discrimination laws apply just as much to big tech companies as they do to the offline world,” she added.

Rosie Sharpe, Senior Campaigner on Digital Threats at Global Witness, said the ruling “marks an important step towards holding Big Tech accountable for how they design their services and the discriminatory impact their algorithms can have on people.”

“We hope this ruling can be used as a springboard for further action, in Europe and beyond,” she added.

While the decision by the Netherlands Institute for Human Rights is not legally binding, experts say that, if the case is further escalated, a court will be required to consider the Institute’s findings.

Dutch lawyer Anton Ekker, who specializes in artificial intelligence and digital rights, told CNN that the Institute’s ruling could lead to fines by the Dutch data protection regulator or orders to modify specific algorithms, specifically those that reinforce inequalities and disproportionately harm marginalized groups based on gender, race, ethnicity or religion.

If Meta does not take action on the job ads algorithm, NGOs might choose to pursue further legal action to stop the discriminatory use of its algorithms, he said.

The Dutch ruling comes as protection of digital rights has been severely undermined, particularly for women and marginalized groups, Bannor said.

Last month, Meta said it would end its diversity, equity and inclusion programs, change its policies on hateful conduct on its platforms and drop its third-party fact-checking programs in the US.

Users are now allowed to, for example, refer to “women as household objects or property” or “transgender or non-binary people as ‘it,’” according to a section of the policy prohibiting such speech that was removed. A new section of the policy notes Meta will allow “allegations of mental illness or abnormality when based on gender or sexual orientation, given political and religious discourse about transgenderism and homosexuality.”

Previously, such comments would have been subject to removal by Meta’s moderators.

Meta has faced various allegations of discrimination over the past decade, including lawsuits in the US regarding housing, employment and credit ads. As a result, the company has modified its algorithm for these ads in the US.

Sharpe at Global Witness told CNN that it’s “outrageous” the same changes were not applied globally, arguing that algorithms and AI are increasingly impacting everyday life and posing significant risks to social justice.

CNN’s Kara Fox contributed reporting.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com