我们的孩子在“有偏见”的育儿测试后被带走。
Our babies were taken after 'biased' parenting test

原始链接: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1wlw2qj113o

格陵兰父母正面临有限的案件复审,尽管他们曾接受“强制家庭联合”(FKU)测试——一项备受争议的计划,该计划评估父母的育儿能力。尽管一些案件正在重新审查,但涉及已完成的收养案件,例如约翰娜和乌尔里克一案,将*不会*由丹麦政府审查。 约翰娜和乌尔里克在2019年与他们早产的儿子共度了17天,之后社工和警察强行带走了他。此前,约翰娜在2010年接受了FKU测试,之后她与前任关系中的两个孩子也被带走。 2019年的评估将约翰娜定义为“自恋”且患有“智力障碍”——她强烈否认这些说法。这对夫妇描述了失去儿子的心碎,强调了FKU计划的破坏性影响以及对家庭造成的持久痛苦。

BBC新闻在Hacker News上分享了一篇报道,讲述了丹麦一起案例,父母因政府强制执行的“有偏见”的心理育儿测试而被剥夺了孩子的抚养权。据报道,该测试包括常识问题,例如“特蕾莎修女是谁?”和“阳光到达地球需要多长时间?” 评论员们对此表示愤怒,并将此事与历史上的强制同化事件相提并论,例如美国对美洲原住民儿童的待遇。 担忧集中在使用伪科学测试来确定父母的适格性以及潜在的人权侵犯。 许多人质疑该测试的有效性以及根据其结果分割家庭的合理性,并希望对丹麦采取法律行动。
相关文章

原文

But not all Greenlandic parents who had children taken into care after completing FKUs will have their cases reviewed.

Johanne and Ulrik's son was adopted in 2020 and the Danish government has said it will not review cases where children have been adopted.

Johanne, 43, was tested in 2019 during pregnancy.

Like Zammi, her son was meant to have been taken away immediately after birth.

But because he was born prematurely on Boxing Day and social workers were on holiday, she and her husband Ulrik got to keep him for 17 days.

"It was the happiest time of my life as a father," says Ulrik, 57.

"Being with my son, holding him, changing his nappy, making sure that Johanne pumps her milk before going to bed in the evening."

Then one day, two social workers and two police officers arrived at Johanne and Ulrik's home to take their son away.

The couple say they pleaded with them not to take him.

Johanne asked if she could breastfeed him one last time.

"As I was dressing my son to hand him over to his foster parents who were on their way, I felt the most horrific heartbreak," Ulrik says.

Johanne had been tested after two children from another relationship, who were five and six, were taken into care after FKU testing in 2010.

Her 2019 assessment describes her as "narcissistic" and as having "mental retardation" - a categorisation based on designations developed by the WHO which were in use at the time.

She rejects both of these descriptions of her.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com