最高法院允许德克萨斯州在2026年使用对共和党有利的国会选区划分图。
Supreme Court Allows Texas To Use A Congressional Map Favorable To Republicans In 2026

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/supreme-court-allows-texas-use-congressional-map-favorable-republicans-2026

最高法院在一项分裂裁决中,允许德克萨斯州继续使用其新的国会选区划分图,用于2024年选举。这张地图受到共和党人欢迎,并得到唐纳德·特朗普的鼓励,旨在增加众议院中共和党席位五个。 法院的保守派多数派质疑种族是否在地图制定中发挥了重要作用,并声称德克萨斯州立法者拥有“党派目标”。自由派大法官持异议,认为该地图非法地根据种族将公民划入选区,违反了宪法。 这项决定暂时停止了下级法院的裁决,该裁决之前曾阻止了该地图的使用,并且是更大范围的全国选区划分斗争的一部分。虽然德克萨斯州、密苏里州和北卡罗来纳州旨在增加共和党席位,但加利福尼亚州则以一张旨在使民主党人受益的地图作为回应。多个州的法律挑战仍在进行中,关于路易斯安那州种族划分选区的另一项案件可能会进一步影响局势。 德克萨斯州官员将这一裁决庆祝为保守派代表制的胜利,而批评者则谴责其为党派权力攫取。

相关文章

原文

Via Headline USA,

A divided Supreme Court on Thursday came to the rescue of Texas Republicans, allowing next year’s elections to be held under the state’s congressional redistricting plan favorable to the GOP and pushed by President Donald Trump

With conservative justices in the majority, the court acted on an emergency request from Texas for quick action because qualifying in the new districts already has begun, with primary elections in March.

The Supreme Court’s order puts the 2-1 ruling blocking the map on hold at least until after the high court issues a final decision in the case.

Justice Samuel Alito had previously temporarily blocked the order while the full court considered the Texas appeal.

The justices cast doubt on the lower-court finding that race played a role in the new map, saying in an unsigned statement that Texas lawmakers had “avowedly partisan goals.”

In dissent, Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the three liberal justices that her colleagues should not have intervened at this point. Doing so, she wrote, “ensures that many Texas citizens, for no good reason, will be placed in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this Court has pronounced year in and year out, is a violation of the Constitution.”

The Texas congressional map enacted last summer was engineered to give Republicans five additional House seats.

The effort to preserve a slim Republican majority in the House in next year’s elections touched off a nationwide redistricting battle.

Texas was the first state to meet Trump’s demands in what has become an expanding national battle over redistricting.

Republicans drew the state’s new map to give the GOP five additional seats, and Missouri and North Carolina followed with new maps adding an additional Republican seat each. To counter those moves, California voters approved a ballot initiative to give Democrats an additional five seats there.

The redrawn maps are facing court challenges in California and Missouri.

A three-judge panel allowed the new North Carolina map to be used in the 2026 elections.

The Trump administration is suing to block the new California maps, but it called for the Supreme Court to keep the redrawn Texas districts in place.

The justices are separately considering a case from Louisiana that could further limit race-based districts under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. It’s unclear how the current round of redistricting would be affected by the outcome in the Louisiana case.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said the Supreme Court’s order “defended Texas’s fundamental right to draw a map that ensures we are represented by Republicans.” He called the redistricting law “the Big Beautiful Map.”

“Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state,” Paxton said in a statement.

“This map reflects the political climate of our state and is a massive win for Texas and every conservative who is tired of watching the left try to upend the political system with bogus lawsuits.”

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott issued a statement saying: “We won! Texas is officially — and legally — more red.”

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi hailed Thursday’s Supreme Court stay, posting on X, “Federal courts have no right to interfere with a State’s decision to redraw legislative maps for partisan reasons.” 

Loading recommendations...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com