华尔街竞相保护自身免受人工智能泡沫影响。
Wall Street races to protect itself from AI bubble

原始链接: https://rollingout.com/2025/12/05/wall-street-protects-itself-ai-bubble/

华尔街正在助推科技巨头在人工智能基础设施上进行大规模借贷——可能是有史以来科技领域最大规模的,仅2025年的债券发行额就可能超过6.46万亿美元。甲骨文、Meta和Alphabet等公司正在寻求资金以建设必要的数据中心,预计至少将花费5万亿美元。 然而,银行并非仅仅乐观。与此同时,它们也在积极利用信用违约互换等衍生品对冲潜在损失,甲骨文和微软等公司的交易量激增。这反映了对这些投资长期盈利能力以及过度暴露的担忧,近期的数据中心中断和暂停债券销售进一步突显了这一点。 贷款方正在使用复杂的工具——包括“重大风险转移”交易——将承销风险转移给其他投资者,他们认识到过度投资和估值问题的可能性。虽然承认人工智能的变革潜力,但华尔街正在悄悄为这些大规模投资未能立即转化为利润的情况做准备。

## 黑客新闻上对人工智能泡沫的担忧 一篇*RollingOut.com*的文章最近在黑客新闻上引发了关于潜在人工智能泡沫的日益增长的担忧。核心问题是华尔街对人工智能公司的投资可能难以为继,可能需要政府救助,由纳税人承担费用——这种情景让人联想到过去的金融危机。 评论者们争论了这种可能性,一些人指出中国积极的人工智能发展是美国可能采取干预措施以避免经济落后的驱动力。另一些人质疑人工智能行业的长期可行性,指出人们的期望被夸大了,并且缺乏可证明的利润。 一个反复出现的主题是潜在的“大到不能倒”的情况,即人工智能公司积累的风险一旦实现,可能会引发更广泛的经济后果。 许多用户对付费人工智能服务的广泛采用表示怀疑,质疑普通人是否会持续支付大量月费。一个关键点是,人工智能主要*转移*价值,而不是*创造*价值,并且其当前价值很大程度上在于组织现有知识。
相关文章

原文

Banks are lending unprecedented sums to technology giants building artificial intelligence infrastructure while quietly using derivatives to shield themselves from potential losses.

Wall Street finds itself in an unusual position as it prepares to lend staggering amounts to artificial intelligence companies. Even as banks facilitate what may become the largest borrowing binge in technology history, they are simultaneously deploying an arsenal of financial tools to protect themselves from the very bubble their money might be inflating.

The anxiety permeating credit markets tells the story. The cost of insuring Oracle debt against default through derivatives has climbed to levels not seen since the Global Financial Crisis. Morgan Stanley has explored using specialized insurance mechanisms to reduce exposure to its tech borrowers. Across trading desks, lenders are quietly hedging positions even as they publicly champion the transformative potential of artificial intelligence.


Unprecedented Wall Street lending to technology giants

Mega offerings from Oracle, Meta Platforms and Alphabet have pushed global bond issuance past $6.46 trillion in 2025. These hyperscalers, alongside electric utilities and related firms, are expected to spend at least $5 trillion racing to build data centers and infrastructure for technology promising to revolutionize the global economy.

The scale is so immense that issuers must tap virtually every major debt market, according to JPMorgan Chase analysis. These technology investments could take years to generate returns, assuming they deliver profits at all. The frenzied pace has left some lenders dangerously overexposed, prompting them to use credit derivatives, sophisticated bonds and newer financial products to shift underwriting risk to other investors.


Technology that may not translate to profits

Steven Grey, chief investment officer at Grey Value Management, emphasized that impressive technology does not automatically guarantee profitability. Those risks became tangible last week when a major outage halted trading at CME Group and served as a stark reminder that data center customers can abandon providers after repeated breakdowns. Following that incident, Goldman Sachs paused a planned $1.3 billion mortgage bond sale for CyrusOne, a data center operator.

Banks have turned aggressively to credit derivatives markets to reduce exposure. Trading of Oracle credit default swaps exploded to roughly $8 billion over the nine weeks ended November 28, according to analysis of trade repository data by Barclays credit strategist Jigar Patel. That compares to just $350 million during the same period last year.

Banks are providing the bulk of massive construction loans for data centers where Oracle serves as the intended tenant, likely driving much of this hedging activity, according to recent Morgan Stanley research. These include a $38 billion loan package and an $18 billion loan to build multiple new data center facilities in Texas, Wisconsin and New Mexico.

Hedging costs climb across the sector

Prices for protection have risen sharply across the board. A five year credit default swap agreement to protect $10 million of Microsoft debt from default would cost approximately $34,000 annually, or 34 basis points, as of Thursday. In mid October, that same protection cost closer to $20,000 yearly.

Andrew Weinberg, a portfolio manager at Saba Capital Management, noted that the spread on Microsoft default swaps appears remarkably wide for a company rated AAA. The hedge fund has been selling protection on the tech giant. By comparison, protection on Johnson & Johnson, the only other American company with a AAA rating, cost about 19 basis points annually on Thursday.

Weinberg suggested that selling protection on Microsoft at levels more than 50% wider than fellow AAA rated Johnson & Johnson represents a remarkable opportunity. Microsoft, which has not issued debt this year, declined to comment. Similar opportunities exist with Oracle, Meta and Alphabet, according to Weinberg. Despite their large debt raises, their credit default swaps trade at high spreads relative to actual default risk, making selling protection sensible. Even if these companies face downgrades, the positions should perform well because they already incorporate substantial potential bad news.

Sophisticated tools to Wall Street shift risk

Morgan Stanley, a key player in financing the artificial intelligence race, has considered offloading some data center exposure through a transaction known as a significant risk transfer. These deals can provide banks with default protection for between 5% and 15% of a designated loan portfolio. Such transfers often involve selling bonds called credit linked notes, which can have credit derivatives tied to companies or loan portfolios embedded within them. If borrowers default, the bank receives a payout covering its loss.

Morgan Stanley held preliminary talks with potential investors about a significant risk transfer tied to a portfolio of loans to businesses involved in AI infrastructure, Bloomberg reported Wednesday. Mark Clegg, a senior fixed income trader at Allspring Global Investments, observed that banks remain fully aware of recent market concerns about possible overinvestment and overvaluation. He suggested it should surprise no one that they might explore hedging or risk transfer mechanisms.

Private capital firms including Ares Management have been positioning themselves to absorb some bank exposure through significant risk transfers tied to data centers. The massive scale of recent debt offerings adds urgency to these efforts. Not long ago, a $10 billion deal in the American high grade market qualified as big. Now, with multi trillion dollar market capitalization companies and funding needs in the hundreds of billions, Teddy Hodgson, global co head of investment grade debt capital markets at Morgan Stanley, suggested that $10 billion represents merely a drop in the bucket. He noted that Morgan Stanley raised $30 billion for Meta in a drive by financing executed in a single day, an event not historically commonplace. Investors will need to adjust to bigger deals from hyperscalers given how much these companies have grown and how expensive capturing this opportunity will prove.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com