联邦法官下令发布关于杰弗里·爱泼斯坦的吉斯莱恩·麦克斯韦尔旧文件。
Federal Judge Orders Release Of Old Ghislaine Maxwell Files About Jeffrey Epstein

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/federal-judge-orders-release-ghislaine-maxwell-files-about-jeffrey-epstein

纽约联邦法官裁定,司法部(DOJ)可以解封与吉斯莲·麦克斯韦尔案件相关的记录,此前“埃普斯坦文件透明法案”已获通过。该法案强制公开涉及埃普斯坦和麦克斯韦尔的记录,并要求在12月19日前提供可搜索格式。 之前曾阻止解封的保罗·恩格尔迈耶法官现在援引新法律,认为其超越了之前的裁决,甚至承认该法律涵盖了大陪审团的材料。司法部要求解封大陪审团记录、证据和调查材料。 这一决定与佛罗里达州关于埃普斯坦2000年代大陪审团调查的类似裁决相符。麦克斯韦尔的法律团队反对解封,认为这可能会损害她获得公正重审的机会,因为她正在寻求人身保护令。尽管如此,法官认为该法律要求公开与麦克斯韦尔、埃普斯坦和相关人员相关的未分类记录。司法部还要求解封针对埃普斯坦的另一案件的记录,目前正在等待裁决。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times,

A federal judge in New York on Dec. 9 ruled that the Department of Justice (DOJ) can unseal records in the case against Jeffrey Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, weeks after the passage of a law that required the government to disclose case records related to both Epstein and Maxwell.

Judge Paul A. Engelmayer issued the ruling after the DOJ, in November, asked two judges in New York to unseal grand jury transcripts and exhibits from Maxwell and Epstein’s cases, along with investigative materials.

Last month, President Donald Trump signed the Epstein Files Transparency Act into law, meaning that the records could be made public within roughly 10 days.

The law requires the DOJ provide Epstein-related records to the public in a searchable format by Dec. 19.

In the order, the judge wrote that the law “does not explicitly refer to grand jury materials,” but added that it “textually covers the grand jury materials in this case.”

“The Court thus finds that modification of the Protective Order is necessary to enable DOJ to carry out its legal obligations under the Act,” he added.

“The Act unambiguously applies to the discovery in this case,” Engelmayer stated, adding that “unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials” are covered in relation to Maxwell, Epstein, and connected individuals.

The decision comes after Engelmayer previously denied DOJ’s bid to release the documents - when he wrote that a “public official,” “lawmaker,” “pundit,” or “ordinary citizen” concerned with the Epstein case would expect them to reveal new information, based on the government’s descriptions, and “come away feeling disappointed and misled.” Most of the material is “entirely a matter of longstanding public record,” he said at the time.

The ruling was issued days after a federal judge in Florida granted the DOJ’s request to release transcripts from a grand jury investigation into Epstein in the 2000s.

Engelmayer is the second judge to allow the DOJ to publicly disclose previously secret Epstein court records. Last week, a judge in Florida granted the department’s request to release transcripts from an abandoned federal grand jury investigation into Epstein in the 2000s.

The Florida judge also cited the recent passage of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, noting that it supersedes DOJ rules and procedures around the sealing of grand jury materials. In its request, the DOJ wanted documents in a 2006–2007 Florida grand jury sex trafficking investigation into Epstein in which he ultimately pleaded guilty on lesser charges.

The records that Engelmayer unsealed pertain to the case against Maxwell, who was sentenced to 20 years in prison for her role in a sex trafficking scheme involving minors.

Following the signing of the Epstein law, the DOJ also submitted a request to unseal records in a New York case against Epstein before he was arrested in 2019. He was later found dead in a New York City jail cell in August 2019 as he was awaiting federal sex trafficking charges.

Another judge in New York has not yet ruled on that request connected to the final Epstein case.

Maxwell’s attorneys, in a letter to Engelmayer, opposed the release of grand jury materials because she is aiming to seek a new trial, although they noted that Maxwell “does not take a position” in response to the request to release the files.

“Releasing the grand jury materials from her case, which contain untested and unproven allegations, would create undue prejudice so severe that it would foreclose the possibility of a fair retrial should Ms. Maxwell’s habeas petition succeed,” her attorneys stated in the Dec. 3 letter.

ZeroHedge contributed to this report

Loading recommendations...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com