如何停止参与?
How do I stop participating?

原始链接: https://geohot.github.io//blog/jekyll/update/2026/01/18/how-do-i-stop.html

这位作者回应了关于其财富和与大型科技公司关系的批评,澄清他们实际上*避免*了长期参与。虽然曾在谷歌、脸书和推特实习,但他们因道德问题(例如脸书的使命)而离开,并且并未从这些公司积累大量财富。他们的收入主要来自漏洞奖励、加密货币工作和节俭的生活。 相反,他们创立了两家公司——comma.ai 和 tiny corp,专注于开源机器人技术和普及人工智能模型训练所需的计算能力(特别是 petaflops)。他们的目标是挑战英伟达的统治地位,认为软件而非硬件才是关键。 作者充满激情地倡导建设更美好的未来,批评那些从事有害技术工作的人,例如监控和操纵性平台设计。他们认为,将重点从以利润驱动的“劣质化”转移到开放、可访问的技术,就能产生重大影响。

一个黑客新闻的讨论围绕着一篇关于如何退出在线参与的文章(链接至geohot.github.io)。一位评论者OgsyedIE指出,作者关于人工智能和权力动态的论点中似乎存在矛盾。 作者最初认为未来取决于*谁控制*人工智能——拥有“root”权限,就像黑客入侵系统一样。然而,他们之前曾认为人工智能的智能最终将不可避免地导致人类被剥削,无论谁拥有它。 OgsyedIE认为这构成了一个虚假的二分法:要么人工智能超越人类组织能力并占据主导地位,要么它会达到极限并保持服从。他们看不到中间地带,强调了作者最初关注于*控制*某种可能最终无法控制的事物的矛盾之处。讨论涉及人工智能重塑权力结构的可能性。
相关文章

原文

This one is for the complainers and whiners.

First off, if you think I ever worked for big tech, you don’t know much about me. I had 3 internships at Google, two when I was very young (18/19) and got a great education that paid me, and one where I just wrote open source software. I worked at Facebook in 2011 for 9 months and quit before any shares vested cause I thought the mission of “wasting the world’s time” was dumb. And oh yes the 5 weeks I worked at Twitter hoping maybe it could be different.

I don’t have too much money; the money I do have I made from pwn2own, CTFs, crypto contracting, and basic market goes up investing. The main reason I have money is because I don’t spend money; for example, I have travelled all around the world, and the best travel experiences I have had were way below cost of living in America. I have never made money from big tech, so I’m definitely not telling you to do something I didn’t do. I’m actually telling you to do exactly what I did.


I started two companies, comma.ai and tiny corp. While I took a small amount of VC from a16z for comma, I never gave up any control, and have 0 intention of doing hypergrowth ponzi scams (lol sorry but ur the bigg scammer). comma and tiny’s last rounds were from individuals who are aligned with the mission.

Both companies are sustainably profitable and produce open source software. I think who owns the robots is going to be a key aspect of what the future looks like. And I don’t mean “owns” from a legalist perspective, I mean “owns” as in the hacker meaning, like “owning” the box. Who has root?

comma has an open source operating system for robotics, currently used in 30k cars for driving, but all robotics tasks are quite similar. There’s a thriving community of forks of the openpilot software and third party openpilot hardware. As it was designed, as it should be.

I realized at some point in comma’s growth that a lot was going to come down to who owns the computers capable of training the models. Hence my second company, tiny corp, with the mission to “commoditize the petaflop.” Petaflops will always be a scarce resource, the best we can hope for is that they are a commodity available to everyone without massive benefits of economies of scale.

We develop full stack software for training, from models to MMIO registers. It’s small and portable, so our hope is that 20 Chinese accelerator companies can be on a level playing field with NVIDIA. NVIDIA’s value comes from their software, not their hardware, what else explains the huge gap between NVIDIA and AMD’s market cap?


To the haters, I have given my life to this shit. What the fuck would I do with a billion dollars anyway? Buy a yacht and fuck Instagram models? Boats are a huge PITA to maintain and ugh I have slept with Instagram models mid experience that I think men only like to show the pretty girl off to other people.

I take this all quite seriously, and I’m trying my best to end up in a good future. Clearly not everyone is. To everyone working on ads, surveillance, gambling, secret research, enshittification, cloud lock-in, what are you doing with your life? Why are you selling out the future?

It doesn’t require everyone to stop, just enough people. And it starts with you.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com