我对Claude Code 1万小时后对Gas Town的看法。
My thoughts on Gas Town after 10k hours of Claude Code

原始链接: https://simonhartcher.com/posts/2026-01-19-my-thoughts-on-gas-town-after-10000-hours-of-claude-code/

在花费超过10,000小时使用Claude Code进行结对编程——作者发现这种工作流程引人入胜且赋能——之后,他们探索了Steve Yegge新的“Gas Town”系统,用于代理工作流程。虽然承认Gas Town有潜力成为未来的一个展望,但作者认为它不符合他们的偏好。 他们核心的问题在于缺乏可见性和控制力。Gas Town严重依赖自主代理,对任务完成的*方式*提供的洞察有限,感觉速度慢,并消除了作者的主动性。他们欣赏底层的“珠子”系统,用于管理任务依赖关系(将工作表示为图形),但不喜欢它与Git的集成,这会使拉取请求变得混乱。 最终,作者更喜欢一种更亲自动手的做法,积极审查代码并保持对流程的清晰理解——Gas Town的“低接触”性质无法提供这一点。虽然对工程技术印象深刻,但他们仍然是“关注代码”的开发者,还没有准备好完全拥抱一个他们看不到代码本身的系统。

Hacker News 新闻 | 过去 | 评论 | 提问 | 展示 | 工作 | 提交 登录 我对使用 Claude Code 10k 小时后的 Gas Town 的想法 (simonhartcher.com) 5 分,by todsacerdoti 3 小时前 | 隐藏 | 过去 | 收藏 | 4 条评论 Redster 1 小时前 | 下一个 [–] Claude Code 推出不到一年。10k/365 = 每天 27.4 小时。恕我直言,我不认为作者使用 Claude Code 接近 10k 小时。回复 stop50 1 小时前 | 父评论 | 下一个 [–] 如果将 gas town 纳入计算,这是有可能的。回复 deevus 1 小时前 | 父评论 | 上一个 | 下一个 [–] 说得对。这标题很吸引人。感觉就像 10,000 小时。回复 deevus 1 小时前 | 上一个 [–] 作者在此。声明:我知道一年没有 10k 小时。:) 指南 | 常见问题 | 列表 | API | 安全 | 法律 | 申请 YC | 联系 搜索:
相关文章

原文
Note from the author

I know that there are not 10,000 hours in a year. I’ve been living inside Claude Code and it feels like a lifetime.

Over the weekend, I had a play with Steve Yegge’s Gas Town. If you don’t know what that is, you should go read this first. I’ve already encountered people in the community who are treating this as the second coming. Steve said it himself that it’s not for everyone, and he’s right.

My time with Claude Code

After almost a year since Claude Code was released, I have been using it daily as frequently as the limits allow. With nights and weekends, I surmise that I have spent over 10k hours with it. I recently upgraded from the $100 to $200 tier of Claude Max. My workflow, which I have touched on before, is focused on pair programming. Whether I am the driver or the observer can vary by the task. Ultimately I feel as though I have more agency when I work this way, and it is way more fun (for me) than letting a suite of agents do all the work.

Agents take my agency away

That’s where my issue with Gas Town lies. It feels like deferring everything to agents, and I get almost no visibility of what’s going on other than work was completed. Don’t get me wrong, I understand that I can ask the mayor to explain what was done, or link me to the code in question, though it feels very cumbersome.

Additionally, with the token speed of current agents (Claude Opus 4.5 in my case), unless you have many rigs operating at once, the whole process just seems really slow. Since I like to be more involved, it just feels like I’m sitting there forever waiting for things to happen.

A small note on beads

Prior to Gas Town’s release, I started using beads. Beads is at the heart of Gas Town. It’s what gt (the Gas Town CLI) uses to keep track of what needs to be done, and what has been done, across all of its agents. I do really like beads, but I still want to look at pull-requests. Since beads stores all of its state in git, those changes pollute every PR you or an agent makes.

What beads illuminates is that agents need contracts. Humans do a pretty good job of intuitively determining the order in which work must happen. Agents don’t have a good grasp of this. Beads solves that by representing issues as a graph. If A blocks B, the agent can’t work on B until A is closed.

I would rather beads didn’t store all of its data in git alongside your work. Git might still be the perfect storage medium (I’m not convinced on that), but it should be separated from the code in my opinion.

The future

I’ve never seen the code, and I never care to, which might give you pause.

Steve Yegge Welcome to Gas Town

Gas Town is undoubtedly a look into the future of low touch agentic focused workflows for everyone. I don’t want to take away from what has been achieved here. I would credit Steve for the engineering, but as he admits, he has never seen the code.

Even if I am vibe engineering, I still care about the code. I still look at it. I think Gas Town is cool, but I don’t think it’s for me, yet.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com