雇主,请使用邮戳信件提交求职申请。
Employers, please use postmarked letters for job applications

原始链接: https://soapstone.mradford.com/employers-use-letters-for-job-applications/

这篇文章认为,利用人工智能自动化求职申请的简易性即将导致大量低质量的申请涌入市场,使招聘变得更加困难。作者提出一个出人意料的低科技解决方案:**要求提交纸质的、邮寄的申请——甚至手写的求职信。** 理由是,增加成本(每份申请约0.80美元)和手写信的努力程度,可以显著提高自动化批量提交的门槛。例如,要求提供复写件或手写样本,可以进一步阻止欺诈申请。 虽然作者承认这个想法不太可能被采纳,并且面临实际挑战(字迹潦草、外包、申请人成本),但他们认为雇主可能会转向现有申请系统内有缺陷的“人工智能保护”措施。最终,他们预见由于人工智能工具越来越容易获得,已经令人沮丧的求职过程将会恶化。

一个黑客新闻的讨论围绕着越来越多的工作申请量,以及过滤掉不合格候选人的潜在解决方案——现在包括由大型语言模型(LLM)生成的申请。 一位用户建议收取小额申请费,承认这对于失业申请者来说是困难的,但强调收到的不相关简历数量过多。 另一位用户指出,要求邮寄申请已经存在,但经常被用于规避招聘美国公民以获取签证的目的。 对话涉及对申请流程本身的更广泛的沮丧,特别是重复的数据录入。 担心阻止LLM的方法也可能会劝退合格的人类申请者,关于受影响的人类或机器人数量的争论不断。 最终,一些人认为需要彻底改革招聘系统,并采用标准化流程。
相关文章

原文

Employers, please consider removing digital job application submissions and instead require job applications to be postmarked using a physical letter.

Requiring the cover letter to be handwritten may also be prudent.

Yes, hiring can get worse

I'm happily employed, but it's possible that maybe one day I'd like to find a different place to work.

Job searching has always been Kafkaesque, but each of my forays into job exploration over the past 10 years have been progressively more Kafkaesque than the last.

Note that you could use LLMs to automate job applications since LLMs got popular, but the barrier-to-entry was fairly high. Now it's trivially low.

mb

I predict a coming barfstorm of job applications, a freefall in hiring success in an already impossible market.

Physicality can help

On paper (🥁), letters check a lot of boxes to address the problems of LLMs:

  • Raises the cost of an application from $0.00 to ~$0.80, reducing junk applications
  • Physicality increases the difficultly of using LLMs to automate submissions
  • Requiring a handwritten cover-letter greatly raises cost for poor/fraudulent submissions, imposes a comparitively smaller cost for genuine ones
    • Require a Carbonless Imprint of the letter, if you don't want to guess if it was printer-printed handwriting in disguise
  • Handwriting is unique- if you're skeptical that an applicant wrote/sent the original letter, witness them write something else and compare
  • Increases the "interest required" in the position, vs spamming application portals
  • No (financial) cost to the employer- update the website text and outline the new requirements

klaus

You're dreaming, dude

I'm not harboring any illusions companies will use letters, but I want to throw it out there at least.

What I suspect will happen instead is that companies will further burrow into third-party application systems that offer "AI protection" (which will be a lie, though a comforting one). In the meantime, despair.

Aha! But you see...

Yeah, it's not perfect:

  • people can transcribe LLM text
  • people will just outsource their letters
  • LA-TEN-CY 👏👏👏
  • meatspace and non-digital documents scare me
  • my handwriting is terrible
  • I can't affort stamps
  • nobody is going to do this
  • LLMs have been applying to jobs for 2 years now, nothing has changed
  • LLMs are already going to destroy the world so why does it matter

Fine sure, none of these are incorrect I guess. But the race-to-the-bottom of online applications will only accelerate as the barrier-to-entry of browser/email/desktop-integrated YOLOed LLMs decreases. Something has got to give.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com