以下是晨星针对2026年退休人员的安全提款率。
Here's Morningstar's Safe-Withdrawal Rate For 2026 Retirees

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/heres-morningstars-safe-withdrawal-rate-2026-retirees

## 安全退休取款率:2026年展望 晨星分析师预测,2026年退休的投资者,3.9%为“安全”的初始取款率。这意味着在假设后续取款随先前的通货膨胀增加的情况下,投资组合资金有90%的概率能够维持30年。对于100万美元的投资组合,这相当于第一年提取3.9万美元。 这一比率高于去年的3.7%和2021年的3.3%,受到预计的资产类别回报和通货膨胀(目前为2.46%)的影响。建议采用30-50%的权益资产配置;更高的权益资产权重(80%)将安全比率降低至3.6%,而更低的权重(10%)则将其降至3.7%,原因是“回报顺序”风险——早期投资组合损失会影响长期可持续性。 更长的退休时间需要更低的初始取款率(35年为3.5%,40年为3.2%)。虽然3.9%是“基本情况”,但替代取款策略,如捐赠基金法(使用10年投资组合平均值)或固定百分比法,可能支持更高的初始比率,最高可达5.7%。最终,成功的退休规划取决于个人情况以及对市场回报和整个退休期间支出模式的假设。

相关文章

原文

Factoring in projected rates for asset-class returns and inflation, Morningstar analysts say the highest "safe" starting withdrawal rate for people retiring in 2026 is 3.9% of portfolio assets. By "safe," Morningstar means this is the highest rate that has a 90% chance of having some money at the end of a 30-year retirement. Depending on the scheme you use for subsequent withdrawals, you may be able to succeed with a higher initial withdrawal rate. 

Morningstar calculates the safe initial-withdrawal rate each year. This year's rate is up 20 basis points from last year's 3.7%. It was just 3.3% in 2021. It bears emphasizing that Morningstar's 3.9% rate isn't for anyone at any point in their retirement: It's an initial withdrawal rate for someone just starting to tap a portfolio in 2026, and then planning to increase subsequent withdrawals by the previous year's inflation rate. For example, someone with a million-dollar portfolio would take $39,000 out in the first year. Let's say price-inflation in 2026 is 5%. Next year's withdrawal would be $39,000 x 1.05, or $40,950. 

We project your portfolio can support a $12.95 withdrawal for a handsome ZeroHedge mug - find yours at the ZeroHedge Store

Morningstar's 3.9% rate also assumes an equity allocation between 30% and 50%. "Because of the higher volatility associated with higher equity weightings, boosting stocks detracts from the starting safe withdrawal percentage rather than adds to it," Morningstar says. That equity-weighting dynamic springs from what makes retirement-withdrawal planning so dicey: "sequence of return" risk. It's the chance that dismal returns in the critical first years of retirement put a major dent in your portfolio, increasing your risk of running out of money.

On a 30-year retirement, Morningstar found equity allocations of 30% to 50% support a 3.9% initial withdrawal. However, an 80% equity weighting dropped it to 3.6%, while a 10% stock exposure cut it to 3.7%. Of course, the duration of your retirement -- how long you expect to live -- is another critical factor. Longer retirements lower the initial safe withdrawal rate. At a 50% equity allocation, the safe rate for a 35-year drawdown is 3.5%, and it's just 3.2% for a 40-year retirement. 

Morningstar acknowledged that increasing withdrawals every year by the inflation rate is just one of many schemes for planning for retirement income. Calling that method the "base case," the firm also projected a safe initial rate using eight other approaches, each of which comes with its own pros and cons. Two methods were tied at the top, supporting a 5.7% initial "safe" withdrawal rate for a 30-year retirement: 

  • Endowment Method: Borrowing from a spending methodology used by college endowments, this one applies a percentage withdrawal rate to the portfolio's average value over time. Morningstar used a 10-year average. At first though, it used the value as of the end of the last year before retirement. With each year into retirement, it added another year to the average, until eventually hitting 10 years and using a 10-year look-back from that point on.
  • Constant Percentage Method: If you're wary of trying to teach complex methods to a spouse who may outlive you, this method shines in its simplicity, as it calculates each year's withdrawal by applying a never-changing rate to the value of the portfolio at year-end. Morningstar put in a floor: Even if the calculation suggests otherwise, the retiree doesn't withdraw less than 90% of the very first withdrawal. 

Retirement-income planning relies heavily on assumptions on a host of variables. Morningstar's calculations from year to year are driven in large part by the firm's expectations for 30-year returns on various asset classes, as well as a projected inflation rate over that horizon. Here are the 30-year return assumptions baked into Morningstar's 3.9% base case: 

  • US Large Growth: 8.58%
  • US Large Value: 8.74%
  • US Small Growth: 10.23%
  • US Small Value: 12.69%
  • Foreign Stocks: 9.36%
  • US Investment-Grade Bond: 4.64%
  • Foreign Bond: 4.68%
  • Cash / US T-Bill: 2.92%
  • Inflation: 2.46%

We'd also note that your spending patterns aren't likely to be uniform over your retirement. Many financial planners break retirement into three conceptual phases, calling the first one "Go-Go," as active, relatively healthy, younger retirees live it up, indulge in frequent travel and restaurant dining, and equip themselves with new leisure goods. Next comes "Slow-Go," where retirees are still up and about, but maybe less adventurous and more satisfied with their possessions. Then, typically in the 80s or 90s, they reach "No-Go," where they're much more prone to staying close to home -- if not confined there -- and spending much less on themselves. (Long-term care expenses can be a wild card here.) 

You can dive deeper into Morningstar's methods here. At the bottom of the top-line report, you can request a far more detailed, 54-page treatment of the topic, with elaborations on nine different retirement income methodologies. 

Loading recommendations...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com