法院文件:ICE应用程序识别抗议者;全球入境和TSA预检被取消。
Court Filings: ICE App Identifies Protesters; Global Entry, PreCheck Get Revoked

原始链接: https://viewfromthewing.com/court-filings-ice-uses-mobile-fortify-to-identify-protesters-global-entry-and-precheck-get-revoked/

美国公民记录或抗议移民执法行为,正面临除逮捕之外的后果——包括失去全球入境和TSA PreCheck的权限。移民和海关执法局(ICE)越来越多地利用先进的监控技术,包括“Mobile Fortify”应用程序进行面部和指纹扫描(已使用超过10万次),以及车牌识别器和手机定位追踪数据,来识别参与抗议的人员。 仅仅“接受调查”就可能导致可信旅客身份被吊销,尽管抗议本身并非法律上的取消资格理由。国土安全部(DHS),负责运行监控系统和全球入境项目,为这些行为辩护,称其合法合规。一名女性报告称,她通过面部识别被识别出姓名,随后因观察ICE活动而失去了她的身份。 虽然国土安全部可以基于广泛的标准撤销访问权限——包括逮捕或任何执法调查——但上诉成功的几率大约为39%,并且在某些司法管辖区,相关决定可以接受司法审查。这种做法引发了对言论自由和公众异议产生寒蝉效应的担忧,类似于专制政权中使用的策略。

最近的法庭文件显示,美国移民及海关执法局(ICE)正在使用面部识别应用程序识别抗议者,导致他们被吊销全球入境(Global Entry)和TSA PreCheck权限。 这引发了Hacker News上关于潜在的权力过大和侵犯公民自由的讨论。 用户质疑TSA关于筛查后数据删除的保证,并指出全球入境和PreCheck *需要* 向国土安全部永久提交生物识别数据。 担忧集中在撤销的广泛标准上——即使是轻微违规行为或仅仅是*被调查*都可能导致失去可信旅客身份。 评论员认为这种做法违反了宪法第一修正案,并可能滥用权力,与对政府追踪和抗议权的担忧相呼应。 一些人认为,“妨碍联邦行动”的理由是一种规避正当程序的策略。 viewfromthewing.com和arstechnica.com等来源正在被分享以获取更多信息。
相关文章

原文

ICE is using a smartphone app called “Mobile Fortify” to scan faces and capture contactless fingerprints, instantly pulling back names and biographical data — and court filings say the same encounters are being followed by revocations of Global Entry and TSA PreCheck.

That turns “trusted traveler” into chilling of speech. DHS runs both the surveillance and the program, and being “under investigation” can be enough to lose your status even if protesting itself cannot legally be a disqualifier.

The Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement is expanding use of identificationand tracking – not just immigration targets but also on U.S. citizens who are documenting, protesting, and observing enforcement operations. And participating in these events is getting Global Entry yanked.

The government is using a smartphone app called “Mobile Fortify” that lets agents scan a face and even capture ‘contactless’ fingerprints and run them through biometric matching systems to return names and biographical data. Reportedly the agency has used Mobile Fortify over 100,000 times. They use BI2 Technologies for smartphone iris scanning against a large law enforcement iris database. The agency defends this all as “lawful.”

In addition, ICE uses license plate reader data, commercial phone location data, drones, and other tools to monitor protests by U.S. citizens.

Global Entry is administered by the Department of Homeland Security, its data was used to train Mobile Fortify, and citizens in the program are subject to having the status revoked if they’re being investigated. DHS investigates people protesting DHS.

  • Customs and Border Protection can deem you ineligible “at its sole discretion” if you present a potential risk for terrorism, criminality, or are otherwise no longer considered low risk. It bases risk determinations partly on demonstrated compliance.
  • They can kick yo uout for arrests or being the subject of an investigation by any law enforcement agency, or suspect conduct that is ‘terrorism-related’.

Protesting isn’t a listed or ‘valid’ reason for having Global Entry revoked, but being arrested at a protest is. Impeding or interfering with the agency is. And being investigated is.

In a court filing, Nicole Cleland says she observing ICE activities in her neighborhood when an agent approached her vehicle, addressed her by name, said they had “facial recognition” and warned she was “impeding” and could be arrested if it happened again. Three days later, she received email notice her Global Entry and TSA PreCheck status was revoked.

Homeland Security does continuous checks on Global Entry members, and may uncover a past conviction that wasn’t disclosed during the application (generally minor offenses over 10 years old, such as a DUI, are fine if you disclose them) or a new conviction. Breaking program rules or rules in the immigration hall such as failing to declare items or bringing ineligible family members with you into the Global Entry queues can get you kicked out if the customs officer decides to make an issue of it.

You can lose Global Entry for complaining about a customs officer. Putting an apple from your flight in your bag, and then not declaring it can cost you your Global Entry. So can attempting a coup against the United States.

So, too, now it seems just for protesting against government policy. And that has a huge chilling effect on public dissent. If you’re punished for expressing views contrary to those in power, you’ll be less likely to express those views. It’ll then appear to others that there’s a consensus supporting those in power, making it harder for still others to dissent. That’s what you get in authoritarian regimes – preference falsification, where everyone publicly tows the dominant line and is unwilling to reveal their true beliefs.

While more people are being kicked out of Global Entry than ever before, 39% of people who appeal the revocation win. Plus, DHS decisions on Global Entry are subject to judicial review, at least in the ninth circuit.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com