洛杉矶纳税人于2025年为无家可归者项目花费了4.18亿美元。
LA Taxpayers Spent $418 Million On Homeless Programs In 2025

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/la-taxpayers-spent-418-million-homeless-programs-2025

洛杉矶市2025年对无家可归者项目的4.18亿美元投资,根据最近的市政厅报告和《纽约邮报》的报道,未能有效提供持久的解决方案。大部分资金用于短期服务,如卫生设施、外展和临时住所——管理无家可归问题,而非解决它。 议员莫妮卡·罗德里格斯严厉批评该体系,称其为缺乏问责制的浪费行为。她特别指出,代价高昂的“Inside Safe”项目管理不善且效果不佳。倡导者约翰·艾利认为,关注服务仅仅是“权宜之计”,没有可证明的无家可归者减少,并且资金分配缺乏透明度。 由于可能出现资金削减——预计两年内将出现2.5亿美元的缺口——人们对当前模式的可持续性以及对更大监督和结果导向型项目的需求日益担忧。目前的模式优先考虑支出,而非实现永久住房解决方案。

相关文章

原文

Los Angeles spent about $418 million on homelessness programs in 2025, yet only a small share went toward helping people leave the streets for good, according to the New York Post. A recent City Hall report suggests most of the money supports short-term services that manage homelessness rather than resolve it.

The review, released as the city prepares major budget cuts, shows that hundreds of millions were directed to hygiene facilities, outreach teams, temporary housing, and vehicle-living programs with limited long-term success. These efforts often keep people in transitional situations instead of moving them into permanent homes.

The Post noted that councilwoman Monica Rodriguez condemned the system, saying, “We’re hemorrhaging money on a homelessness system that was never designed to succeed — and no one is being held accountable for the failure.”

She also argued that ineffective programs are protected instead of evaluated: “If we really wanted to do something about this crisis, we would be advancing real oversight, demanding results, and shutting down programs that don’t work — not protecting a system that keeps spending more while delivering less.”

One of the costliest efforts, Inside Safe, places people in motels and temporary housing at prices far above other programs. Rodriguez criticized its management, stating, “We know where a big pot of money is that isn’t being used wisely — and that’s Inside Safe.”

City officials warn that homelessness funding could fall short by nearly $250 million within two years, raising concerns about sustainability. Community advocate John Alle says the spending model focuses too much on services and too little on lasting change. “Services are a band-aid,” he said. “The numbers never go down. There are no results — and no consequences for mismanagement.”

Alle also accused city leaders of limiting public oversight: “We can’t even begin to calculate the total fraud until officials open their books. These are public funds, and they’re hiding from audits and accountability.”

Loading recommendations...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com