原文
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
原始链接: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43399000
一个Hacker News帖子讨论了名为“Dogequest”的网站,该网站据称泄露了美国特斯拉车主的个人信息。用户们表达了担忧和怀疑。一位评论者推测,该网站可能出于经济目的(做空特斯拉股票)而进行的“心理战”(psyop),或者是一个蜜罐陷阱,而不是出于政治动机。另一位用户强调了对那些不关心政治的特斯拉车主造成的潜在危险。 该帖子质疑该网站的有效性以及以这种大规模拖网方式针对特斯拉车主的逻辑。一些人指出,疏远潜在支持者适得其反。一位用户提供了网站URL,而其他人则质疑新闻报道中缺乏该网站的直接链接。 评论者普遍谴责这种策略是愚蠢的“行动主义”和强加罪责,认为这会适得其反,让温和派的人反感。一位用户将其与艾滋病行动主义进行了比较,而其他人则不同意这种观点,认为这种行为具有分裂性。另一位评论者推测了特斯拉应用程序中的漏洞。
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
This kind of targeting of Tesla owners after the fact is essentially a dragnet that will affect people of all sorts of backgrounds, and is less effective than a direct boycott at achieving your political goals-- since you are going to polarize a huge chunk of people against you. I think many left-leaning protest organizers would understand this, but I may be mistaken since there are a lot of dumbasses in the world.
Again this is total speculation, but alarm bells immediately went off in my head.
reply