最高法院首席大法官表示,在特朗普猛烈抨击之后弹劾法官“不合适”。
SCOTUS Chief Justice Says Impeaching Judge 'Not Appropriate' After Trump Lashes Out

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/scotus-chief-justice-issues-rare-statement-says-impeaching-activist-judges-not

特朗普总统呼吁弹劾美国地方法官詹姆斯·博斯伯格,此前博斯伯格叫停了针对刑事犯罪非法移民的驱逐出境行动。特朗普称博斯伯格为“麻烦制造者和煽动者”,并暗示要弹劾其他对他作出不利裁决的法官。 首席大法官约翰·罗伯茨就此发表了一份罕见的声明,他认为弹劾并非对司法裁决异议的恰当回应,并强调了正常的上诉审查程序的存在。罗伯茨为博斯伯格辩护引发了猜测,原因是他们之前的关联,以及博斯伯格任命玛丽·麦科德为外国情报监视法院之“法庭之友”。 法学教授乔纳森·特里也批评了特朗普的弹劾呼吁,尽管他此前与博斯伯格存在分歧。特里建议特朗普政府应寻求加快上诉程序。他指出,美国司法体系的正常程序是政府对裁决提出上诉。


原文

On Tuesday, President Trump said on Truth Social that US District Judge James Boasberg should be impeached for issuing a two-week halt to his efforts to deport criminal illegal aliens - calling Boasberg a "troublemaker and agitator."

Trump's call to remove Boasberg - the chief judge of the federal district court in Washington DC, marks the first time that he's asked Congress to seek a judge's removal. Trump also suggested that "many" of the judges who have ruled against him in other cases should be impeached as well.

 

Then, hours later, Chief Justice John Roberts pushed back - saying in a rare statement that it would be inappropriate to impeach a judge.

Photograph: Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP

"For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose," Roberts said Tuesday.

Of course, that would be up to Congress - wouldn't it?

As TheLastRefuge notes on X, Roberts and Boasberg go way back...

"Yes, Roberts will protect Boasberg, because Boasberg -who Roberts appointed to be presiding judge of the FISC- has major leverage over Roberts. Boasberg has assembled his shields over years, and CTH has outlined every step. The brutally obvious began surfacing when Boasberg appointed *Mary McCord as amicus to the FISC."

Law professor Jonathan Turley agrees with Roberts, however, writing on Sunday;

I have criticized Judge Boasberg, who was involved in the controversial FISA surveillance during the first Trump term and made a poor choice of the attorney tasked with investigating that matter. I also criticized him in prior treatment of pro-life litigants in a case reversed by the D.C. Circuit. However, he has also ruled against Trump critics).

The response for the Administration should be to seek an expedited appeal. The district court cannot drag out a TRO very long before issuing an order that can be appealed.

This country is facing novel issues and the Administration is not surprisingly trying to use novel means to address them. I expect that it will prevail in many of these initial fights while losing others. That is part of the process in a nation committed to the rule of law.

The Trump Administration can appeal and leave impeachment out of it.

Loading...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com