(评论)
(comments)

原始链接: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43422033

一篇Hacker News帖子讨论了一篇关于理解太阳能的文章。一位评论者强调,电池储能正在显著平缓2024年加州的“鸭子曲线”,这显示出比文章中2023年的数据更进一步的进展。另一位评论者寻求对太阳能电池板成本大幅下降的见解,将其归因于规模化生产和诸如减小线径金刚石线锯之类的渐进式技术进步,并指出单晶硅的统治地位,尽管存在替代技术。发帖者提到钙钛矿仍然是一个未知数。另一位用户补充说,CdTe太阳能电池仍在使用,尽管并不广泛。最后,该帖子指出瓦茨拉夫·斯米尔早先预测光伏发电不会快速增长,但这与近期太阳能电池板安装量的快速增长相矛盾,超过了之前的预期。

相关文章
  • (评论) 2025-03-19
  • 太阳能成本能否持续下降? 2024-08-31
  • (评论) 2024-07-07
  • 了解太阳能 2025-03-20
  • (评论) 2025-03-04

  • 原文
    Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
    Understanding Solar Energy (construction-physics.com)
    24 points by chmaynard 2 hours ago | hide | past | favorite | 4 comments










    Great article. Unfortunately his California duck curve graph only shows 2023. A graph including 2024 shows how batteries are dramatically flattening the duck curve:

    https://cdn-ilcjnih.nitrocdn.com/BVTDJPZTUnfCKRkDQJDEvQcUwtA...

    https://reneweconomy.com.au/battery-storage-is-dramatically-...



    Good longread.

    What I'd like to have a better understanding of, and I'm hoping to crowdsource here, is exactly how the solar panel cost has come down so precipitously. Part of it is simply manufacture scaling - almost everything is much cheaper in large quantities. But part of it must be a thousand incremental tech advances. Things like the reduced kerf diamond wire saw.

    Also of note: I think monocrystalline has won completely? People experimented with all sorts of alternate chemistries and technologies, like ion deposition and the extremely poisonous CIGS, but good old "Czochralski process + slice thinly" has won despite being energy intensive itself.

    Perovskites remain an unknown quantity.



    CdTe is still out there, from First Solar, but it's not much of the market (and has scalability problems due to the need for tellurium, even if the active layer is much thinner than in silicon cells.)


    The bit how about incredibly quickly PV has grown is a figurative slap in the face to Vaclav Smil. He had just ten years earlier said PV wasn't going to grow quickly because historically energy replacements took a long time.

    https://vaclavsmil.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/scientific...

    This retrospective on Smil's predictions four years ago is notable:

    https://www.quora.com/Is-Vaclav-Smil-right-in-his-criticisms...

    "To get 1 PWh/year of electricity you need to install about 450 GW worth of solar panels. You need dozens of years to acomplish such task. Reality check: 3 years in current speed, in the future probably faster."

    Indeed, as the thread top link shows in 2024 the world installed 595 GW of PV.

    As John Kenneth Galbraith said, "If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error."







    Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!


    Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact



    Search:
    联系我们 contact @ memedata.com