(评论)
(comments)

原始链接: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43586117

Hacker News用户正在讨论一篇关于医学用途道德来源的“备用”人体的文章。评论提出了关于这些人体在被赋予权利之前需要具备的智力水平的伦理担忧,在“海蛞蝓”水平和“老鼠”水平的智力之间划了一条线。一些用户认为,如果备用人体使用成为现实,那么来源不明的尸体可能会主导市场,而另一些用户则指出了维持健康、不活动的人体的实际挑战。另一位用户指出,这项技术甚至在老鼠身上都没有得到证实,建议首先关注动物应用。几位评论员担心这项技术会加剧现有的不平等,使其只对富人可用,并以不公平的方式延长他们的寿命。一位用户认为,一项技术的开发始于一小部分人。


原文
Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
Ethically sourced "spare" human bodies could revolutionize medicine (technologyreview.com)
15 points by iancmceachern 5 hours ago | hide | past | favorite | 12 comments












I've been thinking about this. If we can create human bodies that never achieve an intelligence level beyond that of a sea slug, then surely nobody rational would be against using them for science. But where is the line? If the human bodies are as intelligent as, say, a mouse, are they then entitled to human rights, and can't be grown for the sole purpose of harvesting their organs? It's a serious topic.


RealDoll’s CEO perks up.


Ethically sourced "spare" human bodies could revolutionize the market for unethically sourced "spare" human bodies ...


Have the feeling that cheaper unethically sourced bodies would be the majority of the market, if ever usage of "spare" bodies were to happen.


They already did this in conflict zones.

It's funny how people strech the definition of things. But hey, if it worked for HD it shall work for everything.



That sounds like wishful thinking. Body that doesn't move just wastes away. People are imagining perfect bodies peacefully lying down but it would be more like a something between neurology ward and hospice.


> We do not know whether the embryo models recently created from stem cells could give rise to living people or, thus far, even to living mice.

So it doesn't even work in mice... how about we get that working first. Then maybe grow chickens/cows for meat. Then write "revolutionize medicine" headlines.



Can we please not make out-of-touch, old, rich people live any longer than they should.

They will be the only ones capable of affording this service. Reminds me of meths from the altered carbon series.



Technology always starts out being available to a subset of people before it's available for everyone. This is the path that leads to making it available to everyone.


I mean, if can mandate that "no out-of-touch, old, rich people" can "live longer than they should" to solve the problem, then we could ALSO solve the problem more directly and thoroughly by just mandating that "this is available to everyone". I don't make the rules, that's how this hypothetical works out if you think about it.


This is a terrible plan.






Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact



Search:
联系我们 contact @ memedata.com