拟议中的科罗拉多州法律:家长因“误认性别”可能失去监护权,“强制控制”引关注
"Coercive Control": Parents Could Lose Custody Under Proposed Colorado Law For "Misgendering"

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/coercive-control-parents-could-lose-custody-under-proposed-colorado-law-misgendering

乔纳森·特里利认为,父母权利正在成为一股蓬勃发展的民权运动,突显出左翼和右翼意识形态之间日益激烈的冲突。他批评第一巡回法院的一项裁决,该裁决允许学校向父母隐瞒孩子的性别转变,并重点关注科罗拉多州拟议的众议院法案25-1312,该法案可能将对孩子的“死名”或“错误性别称呼”视为“强制控制”,从而可能导致失去监护权。特里利用一个个人轶事来说明养育子女的文化规范与该法案的影响可能如何发生冲突。他担心虐待的定义可能会扩展到监护权纠纷之外,影响到一般的家庭。他指出,最高法院也将审议科罗拉多州“转换治疗”禁令的合法性。特里利批评支持该法案的民主党议员,认为他们忽视了父母的权利,并误判了政治格局,他认为这个问题超越了党派界限。


原文

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

Parental rights are emerging as one of the major civil liberties movements of this generation — and one of the greatest conflicts between the right and the left in this country. For example, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit ruled schools can hide a change of gender in young children from their parents. Now, Colorado is poised to pass a law that would threaten the custody rights of parents who “deadname” or “misgender” their own children. If a parent does not adopt a child’s new pronouns or name, they could be found to have exercised “coercive control” and lose custody in divorce proceedings in favor of a more enlightened parent.

As someone who grew up in an Italian family, I must confess that I thought “coercive control” of a parent was called . . . well . . . parenting. I can still remember my Sicilian mother brandishing a broom in front of our door to prevent one of my sisters from going out with a boy that she did not like. She simply declared “I gave you life, I can take it away” and my sister went back upstairs.

I admit the Italian parental style can be a bit shocking for outsiders and misunderstood by many. (My Irish father would sit bemused in the kitchen). In reality, it was all drama but you knew that it conveyed not anger but love.

Under the new proposal, House Bill 25-1312, Colorado would use the “Kelly Loving Act” to make “deadnaming” and “misgendering” children a factor in child custody disputes. Referring to your child’s biological gender or given name or pronoun would now be considered harmful and abusive, inviting a court to take your child away from you as a coercive parent.

“Section 2 provides that, when making child custody decisions and determining the best interests of a child for purposes of parenting time, a court shall consider deadnaming, misgendering, or threatening to publish material related to an individual’s gender-affirming health-care services as types of coercive control. A court shall consider reports of coercive control when determining the allocation of parental responsibilities in accordance with the best interests of the child.”

So the state will require parents to adopt a gender, name, and pronoun that they believe are harmful for their children. 

Many such parents may believe that a young child should proceed slowly and not make such changes as they consider the implications of such decisions.

One question is whether this would be limited to custody proceedings or eventually expand to families generally. 

If this is deemed abusive or harmful during custody battles, it would also be presumably abusive or harmful outside of such proceedings. The fear is that the underlying conclusions could support a view of a household being abusive and not being in the best interests of the child.

Notably, the Supreme Court will now be considering a Colorado case involving a ban on counselors offering “conversion therapy” for children. 

Under the state rule, a counselor can lose her license if she agrees to such counseling at the request of her parents. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit tossed the challenge, ruling that conversion therapy is harmful and the rule is part of an effort to regulate the healthcare profession.

Rep. Lorena Garcia, D-Denver, insisted that:

“This bill is the bare minimum of what we can do as a state, and the fact that we have to legislate for people to not bully and misgender and deadname people because of whatever insecurities they might have is sad to me. Why can’t we just respect one another? Why can’t we just understand that someone else’s identity has nothing to do with me or you?”

The bill passed the committee on a straight party vote with Republicans in opposition. I believe that the Democrats are not just ignoring parental rights but political realities. They will find that this is not a partisan issue. It is a primal issue. For parents, Democratic politicians like Garcia fail to “understand” that it has a lot “to do with them.” 

They are the parents of these children. If Democrats do not “understand” that, they are likely soon to find that out.

Loading...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com