解读可选零售的数学难题:每股收益风险与价格上涨迫近
Making Sense Of Discretionary Retail Math As EPS Risks & Price Hikes Loom

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/making-sense-discretionary-retail-math-eps-risks-price-hikes-loom

摩根士丹利分析师预测,由于美中贸易摩擦可能加剧关税,可选消费零售业的每股收益将大幅下滑。服装/鞋类(软性商品)2025年的每股收益平均下降35%,其中Foot Locker、Kohl's和Under Armour受影响最大,因为它们严重依赖中国供应链且利润率低。Levi Strauss、On Holding和Tapestry由于中国采购比例较小,处境相对较好。 一般零售(硬性商品)预计每股收益下调风险为33%。Five Below、Academy Sports和Dollar Tree面临的每股收益潜在跌幅最大。Kroger、Albertsons、AutoZone和O'Reilly预计影响最小。 报告指出,中国供应链占比高的零售商面临近期每股收益压力,可能上调消费者价格。分析师们指出了中国和美国双重采购占比高的百货公司,以及采购占比最低的百货公司,还包括美国和越南采购占比高的专业零售商。这份报告旨在帮助投资者应对关税风险,并青睐那些已实现供应链多元化的公司。


原文

Morgan Stanley analysts have released a report that drills into the "tariff math" for clients, outlining how President Trump's ongoing trade war with China could impact the discretionary retail sector—specifically Softlines (apparel and footwear) and Hardlines (general retail) companies within their stock coverage universe with the highest exposure to Chinese supply chains. The report also identifies which retailers are likely to raise prices the most.

Analysts, including Alex Straton, first described which companies across their Softlines and Hardlines stock coverage universe face the greatest EPS downside in 2025 due to tariff-related pressures:

Softlines/Hardlines tariff analysis, we estimate the potential impact on EPS across our coverages. Within Softlines, we calculate ~35% avg. '25e EPS downside, with FL, KSS, & UAA appearing most at risk. For Hardlines, we estimate ~33% fully annualized negative revision risk to EPS, on average, with FIVE, ASO, & DLTR most at risk.

Here are the analysts' key findings on the impact of the 145% tariff on Chinese goods and the 10% tariff on imports from other countries (excluding USMCA members) on Softlines stocks within their coverage:

  • Average EPS Downside: ~35% reduction in 2025e EPS due to tariffs.

  • Most Vulnerable: Foot Locker (FL), Kohl's (KSS), and Under Armour (UAA) face the largest EPS downside due to US/China sourcing exposure and low operating margins.

  • Best Positioned: Levi Strauss (LEVI), On Holding (ONON), and Tapestry (TPR) expect low-single-digit EPS downside, benefiting from minimal China sourcing and high international revenue.

Key findings for hardline stocks under the analysts' coverage universe:

  • Average EPS Downside: ~33% fully annualized EPS revision risk.

  • Most Vulnerable: Five Below (FIVE), Academy Sports (ASO), and Dollar Tree (DLTR) face severe impacts (30% to >100% EPS reduction) due to high China sourcing and low margins.

  • Least Impacted: Kroger (KR), Albertsons (ACI), AutoZone (AZO), and O'Reilly (ORLY) expect minimal impact (<15% EPS reduction) due to low/no China exposure and robust margins.

Given the expected EPS hit across a wide range of Softlines and Hardlines stocks, the analysts identified the companies that have the highest supply chain exposure to China—posing not only near-term EPS pressure but also the risk of higher prices on store shelves.

Department stores with the greatest China-US sourcing exposure, as per analysts' coverage, and brands with the least.

Specialty retailers with the greatest US-Vietnam sourcing exposure. 

Department stores with the greatest US sales exposure. 

Estimated direct and indirect supply chain sourcing exposure to China (as % of total).

These are the retailers expected to roll out the highest price hikes on items.

The report builds on our earlier note, citing Goldman's warning at the start of the month about the apparel brands and retailers most vulnerable to price hikes (view: here). Together, these reports offer a guide for readers to avoid the tariff landmines at some retailers and reward the companies that listened to Trump in his first term to shift supply chains out of China.

Loading...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com