雅达利Mega ST:玩转商界——保罗·勒菲布尔
Atari Means Business with the Mega ST

原始链接: https://www.goto10retro.com/p/atari-means-business-with-the-mega

雅达利Mega ST于1987年发布,是雅达利进军工作站市场的尝试。它提供2MB或4MB内存和一个用于加速图形处理的位块传输芯片(blitter chip),目标是成为桌面出版解决方案。其“披萨盒”式设计采用可拆卸键盘(其Cherry机械轴广受好评)和内置软驱。然而,设计缺陷包括机箱狭窄和端口位置不便。 尽管Mega ST拥有诸多优势,但它也遭受了一些挫折。它沿用了与更便宜的520ST和1040ST相同的8MHz处理器速度,限制了其性能优势。此外,DRAM价格问题也影响了整个计算机行业。雅达利也难以摆脱其在游戏领域的形象,这使得向企业销售更高价位的电脑变得困难。Mega ST虽然没有取得商业上的成功,但却为改进后的Mega STE铺平了道路,并因其出色的键盘和充足的内存而被人们铭记。

Hacker News上的一篇帖子讨论了Atari Mega ST,强调了它即使在今天也仍然与MIDI音乐制作令人惊讶的相关性。用户称赞Atari的低延迟、稳定的MIDI定时,这归功于其与现代更复杂系统不同的直接硬件连接。一位用户每天使用4台这样的机器。 虽然现代CPU功能强大,但操作系统开销往往会引入不可接受的抖动。一些用户回忆起更简单、更确定的计算时代,而另一些用户则承认现代便利性的权衡取舍。一些人讨论了Atari ST与Commodore Amiga的相对优点。另一个讨论是关于Atari和Amiga的软件各自的功能,以及为什么ST在MIDI方面胜出。 评论深入探讨了Atari的工业设计、硬件限制以及廉价PC对家用电脑市场的影响。一些人建议使用现代微控制器仿真来重现Atari的响应速度。该帖子既体现了对Atari的怀旧之情,也认可了Atari的特定优势,尽管与现代系统相比,它总体上存在局限性。Mega ST的键盘也被认为是相对于竞争对手而言特别高质量的,使用了Cherry MX轴。

原文

Announced at CES in January 1987, the Mega ST was Atari’s first attempt at creating full-fledged workstation for professional users.

There is some conflict as to whether these are called Mega STs or just Megas. I’ve seen both names used and even have seen labels with both names. I tend to use Mega ST as it is much clearer and sounds less like “Amiga”.

By this point, the timeline for the ST was:

It makes some sense that Atari would want to take the ST upmarket. Both the 520ST and 1040ST were largely mass-market product and sold with a thin profit margin. In order to continue to grow as a company, a product with a bigger profit margin was definitely needed.

Unfortunately the Mega ST had some issues with both its design and its market timing that hurt its chances. Let’s look at the design first.

The Mega ST takes the standard ST and puts it into a low-profile “pizza-box” case with an internal double-sided (720K) floppy drive and a detachable keyboard.

The keyboard was actually rather nice with cherry key switches. Sadly it retained the rather large key sizes of the earlier ST models, making typos too easy. It also had the connection for the mouse and joystick under the keyboard, which kept things neat and tidy but was a major pain to connect in the first place. The low profile of the case also meant that the disk drive slot would bump into the keyboard if the two were close together.

Overall, I’d say the keyboard is a solid B+ and it is a sought-after keyboard today for its reliability. This keyboard also works great with the Mega STE and I’d love to get my hands on one.

Other case differences include a built-in fan and a built-in battery-backed clock that ran on simple AA batteries. The fan was probably not really needed, but it likely improved reliability.

As far as technical specifications, the Mega ST did not have many advantages over a standard 1040ST. Its main improvement was that it had a blitter chip that could move data in memory around fast, which was great for graphics processing. The Mega ST was the first to include TOS 1.02, which was the first update to TOS in ROM and included several bug fixes.

Perhaps the biggest “innovation” was the RAM. The Mega ST was available with 2MB or 4MB of RAM, an enormous amount in 1987. This much RAM was a game-changer for developers and desktop publishing.

Lastly there was an internal bus connector slot, which ended up not really being all that important. The only thing I know that used it were some hard drive kits that would provide a way to squeeze the hard drive inside the Mega ST case. This points out a problem in the case design: it was just too short and didn’t have much room for anything else to be in there.

It would have made sense for Atari to sell an internal hard drive upgrade for the Mega ST, but instead they sold a separate external hard drive, the MegaFile, that you could place under the Mega ST. Modular perhaps, but more expensive and messier than an internal solution that would also not have external cables or a power supply.

By far the biggest technical limitation was that the Mega ST ran at the same speed at the 520ST and 1040ST: 8Mhz. The blitter certainly could speed up the display operations of some apps, but the Mega ST basically ran everything at the same speed as the older and much cheaper STs.

The Mega ST was often promoted in combination with the SLM804 Laser Printer as a complete desktop publishing solution for just $3000 to $4000. At the time this was touted as a full system at the same price as just the laser printer for a Macintosh.

I don’t recall seeing Atari specifically market the Mega ST to developers, but I suspect a lot of developers found the better keyboard and extra RAM to be worth the upgrade.

In general, I think Atari had a tough time selling such an expensive product. Even in 1987, the Atari brand was closely associated with video games and inexpensive computers. Trying to use the Atari brand for more expensive computers aimed at businesses was always going to be difficult. After all, many business would definitely balk at having the Atari label on their desks.

Although I never owned a Mega ST, my Dad did have a Mega ST 2. Since he also had the SC1224 color monitor, I would sometimes use it to play games. I remember hogging his Mega ST to play Dungeon Master quite often. I also remember that the keyboard was really nice and miles better than the one on my 1040ST. He also had an external hard drive, which he was able to place under the Mega ST.

The Mega ST was not a huge success for Atari. Although it was announced in early 1987, systems did not start shipping until late 1987 with most not shipping until 1988. The problem was the extra RAM. The Mega ST used 1Mbit DRAM, which actually had a significant price increase and shortage due to tariffs on overseas DRAM. This pricing problem affected the computer industry as a whole, but definitely hit Atari hard with its low margins.

It was about this time that Atari seemed to focus more on the European market, sending more product there instead of the US.

The Mega ST was eventually replaced by the Mega STE in 1991/1992. Looking back, I think everyone would have wanted to see something like the Mega STE in 1988, but that just wasn’t meant to be.

The Mega ST takes up a lot of space on a desk, is not easily upgradable and is no faster than a standard 1040ST.

I have a Mega STE and I prefer it in every way over a Mega ST, except perhaps the keyboard. So other than the keyboard, I don’t think Mega ST computer are in high demand today.

For more about the Mega ST, check out the review in ST Log #18 (April 1988):

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com