我不使用LLM进行编程。
I don't use LLMs for programming

原始链接: https://neilmadden.blog/2026/03/02/why-i-dont-use-llms-for-programming/

这篇语录集强调了学习、教学和理解之间强大的联系,尤其适用于编程。道格拉斯·亚当斯指出,向他人解释一个概念,*特别是*那些难以理解的人,会迫使你更深入地理解它,因为这需要简化。 艾伦·珀利斯也表达了类似观点,他认为真正的知识并非仅仅来自于学习,而是来自于能够*编程*——将想法分解为可执行的步骤。卡尔·弗里德里希·高斯补充说,学习的*过程*,而不仅仅是结果,才是真正令人满足的地方。 本质上,将复杂的想法转化为他人(或机器)能够理解的形式,能够巩固我们自身的理解。在这个过程中,老师往往比学生学到更多。这证明了积极参与和简化在实现真正理解方面的力量。

相关文章

原文

I originally posted this on Mastodon, but I thought I’d add it here too:

“What I mean is that if you really want to understand something, the best way is to try and explain it to someone else. That forces you to sort it out in your own mind. And the more slow and dim-witted your pupil, the more you have to break things down into more and more simple ideas. And that’s really the essence of programming. By the time you’ve sorted out a complicated idea into little steps that even a stupid machine can deal with, you’ve certainly learned something about it yourself. The teacher usually learns more than the pupil. Isn’t that true?” — Douglas Adams

“It is not knowledge, but the act of learning, not possession, but the act of getting there which generates the greatest satisfaction.” — Carl Friedrich Gauss

“You think you KNOW when you learn, are more sure when you can write, even more when you can teach, but certain when you can program.” — Alan Perlis (of course)

(Ironically, WordPress is now offering to “improve” these quotes with AI…)

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com