你的手机就是一台完整的电脑。
Your Phone Is an Entire Computer

原始链接: https://medhir.com/blog/your-phone-is-an-entire-computer

最近发布的599美元MacBook Neo,搭载与iPhone 16 Pro相同的A18 Pro芯片,凸显了苹果对其设备采取的不同策略带来的令人沮丧的差异。尽管拥有相同的计算能力,iPhone在软件访问方面受到严格限制,迫使用户完全依赖App Store。 作者认为这并非出于“用户安全”考虑,而是为了维护苹果的控制权和利润率。MacBook Neo允许用户自由下载软件,运行不受限制的代码,甚至安装替代操作系统如Linux——这些自由被iPhone用户剥夺,因为其启动加载程序被锁定且环境被沙箱化。 现在,iPhone已经明显能够运行MacOS,这种人为的限制显得尤为过分。作者提倡“root权限”,认为个人应该有权使用其拥有的设备的全部功能,无论其形态如何,并挑战了移动设备需要独特限制的说法。

## 智能手机作为电脑 & 苹果的限制 一个由Hacker News用户发起,关于在智能手机屏幕破裂后临时使用基本翻盖手机的讨论,突显了现代手机作为 полноценных 电脑的潜力。通过USB-C适配器,该手机的功能类似于Chromebook,引发了人们对智能手机过度使用的反思。 对话很快转向了苹果为何不完全拥抱这种能力,尽管三星DeX等技术已经存在多年。许多人认为苹果故意限制功能以保护利润并维持“封闭花园”生态系统,可能蚕食Mac的销量。另一些人则认为苹果优先考虑产品细分和一致的用户体验,重视控制而非“多面手”的方法。 人们对企业对软件和操作系统的限制表示担忧,这些限制是由利润动机驱动的看门人行为。然而,一些人认为这些限制也有助于设备的安全性与可靠性,吸引了不精通技术的用户。美国运营商对设备兼容性的限制也被认为是影响因素。最终,这场讨论表明,像苹果这样的公司做出了一种深思熟虑的选择,即保持控制并最大化收入,即使这意味着限制了强大移动设备的全部潜力。
相关文章

原文

Your iPhone (or any other smartphone) is a computer capable of running a complete desktop operating system, and has been so for quite some time.

A week ago, Apple asked us to say hello to MacBook Neo. It's a very reasonably priced entrant to the Mac laptop line, just $599. It's perfect for students, priced at just $499 with an education discount.

I have no arguments against this device's existence. But I couldn't help but also notice it comes equipped with an A18 Pro chip, the very same chip that powers the iPhone 16 Pro I carry in my pocket. I'm bothered, as I have been since the original iPad introduction 16 years ago, by the unnecessary restrictions placed by corporate powers to run third-party software and operating systems on devices we own.

Screenshot of the Macbook Neo's product page. Depicts a pink, yellow, navy blue, and silver MacBook with the header "Love at first Mac." The subheader says "Introducing MacBook Neo, an amazing Mac at a surprising price. With a durable design, beautiful colors, and powerful features, it's a magical new way to fall head over heels with Mac, every day. Welcome to the family." "Love at first Mac." Welcome to the family! Don't ever think of putting MacOS on your iPad though!

On the MacBook Neo, I can ostensibly go to a browser, any browser, and click links to download whatever software I'd like.

On my iPhone, there is no such ability. As a US citizen, I must go through the Apple-approved App Store to download / install third-party software. Smells like freedom.

On the MacBook Neo, I can run code and build software with no restrictions.

On my iPhone, this ability is heavily sandboxed and there is no full access to the filesystem through a user accessible shell, as much as I may want one.

On the MacBook Neo, I can even opt to not use MacOS at all and instead install Asahi Linux if I so choose (assuming Apple continues to allow custom kernel booting as it has in M-series Macs).

On my iPhone, the only operating system I can use is iOS – the boot loader for iPhones and iPads is locked down as to restrict "jailbreaking", otherwise known as modifications that allow a device owner to install software outside of Apple-vetted channels.

Both this new MacBook offering and my iPhone use the same system on a chip, down to the number of CPU cores, GPU cores and gigabytes of RAM. Apple would like to have everyone believe these devices are fundamentally different, that the iPhone must be locked in the name of "user safety", because clicking on links is dangerous.

That is an insult to the average person's intelligence. Despite the form factor differences, these devices are basically the exact same thing. The iPhone / iPad have been restricted in their ability to download software straight from the internet, not due to “safety”, but because Apple has a significant profit motive in doing so.

The MacBook is capable of running iOS, iPad OS, MacOS, or any other OS for that matter. The latest iPhones are equally capable of running MacOS, demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt by this latest product announcement.

An iPhone is a MacBook, is an iPad, is an iPhone. But not actually, because Apple has artificially deemed so through strict hardware-level controls.

In right to root access, I laid out the case for why the right to choose the software loaded on devices we own must be advocated for in the broader "right to repair" discussion.

Nearly two decades after the iPhone was first announced, the chips Apple developed have grown into computing beasts, so much so that even ones meant for iPhones can run MacOS.

The mechanisms employed over these same two decades to restrict software loading on mobile devices are unacceptable. These restrictions are boons for corporate and sovereign powers that would like to control what you can do with your computing devices.

I want to work towards the precedent that every device you own should have the capacity to load the software of your choice. Mobile devices are not special, they are general computers in a handheld form factor, artificially restricted from loading software to keep corporate profits and government controls intact. The narrative that mobile devices are somehow different enough to warrant restrictions on software loading mainly benefits actors that don’t have the average person’s best interests at heart.

meme of Brittany Broski making a grossed out face at the statement “letting iPad Pro run Mac OS”, while making an intrigued face at the statement “letting iPhone SOC run MacOS”

Now that I know my iPhone has the capacity to run MacOS, I would very much like to do so. I’d love to consider the possibility of switching to a less intrusive phone and repurposing this iPhone into a web server. Perhaps that seems silly, but it’s really not. I’ve already paid for the device, it's clearly a full blown computer, and why should I not be able to modify it as I see fit?

A right to root access would make all of this possible. And I really want to run MacOS on my iPhone now, damn it.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com