联邦调查局正在购买定位数据以追踪美国公民,局长已证实。
FBI is buying location data to track US citizens, director confirms

原始链接: https://techcrunch.com/2026/03/18/fbi-is-buying-location-data-to-track-us-citizens-kash-patel-wyden/

联邦调查局已恢复从数据经纪人处购买美国公民的数据,包括位置记录,据局长卡什·帕特尔最近的证词。 此做法自2023年暂停后重新开始,允许该机构在*无需*获得搜查令的情况下,访问从日常应用程序和游戏中收集的信息——批评人士认为这种方法绕过了宪法第四修正案对无理搜查的保护。 联邦调查局认为这些购买行为符合现行法律,如《电子通讯隐私法》,并能产生有价值的情报。 参议员罗恩·怀登称之为“公然绕过”搜查令要求的行为。 数据经纪人通过实时竞价等广告技术收集这些信息,追踪用户位置和其他可识别数据。 目前,联邦调查局认为购买商业数据不需要搜查令,这一法律立场尚未在法庭上受到挑战。 一项两党法案《政府监控改革法案》已提出,要求对这类数据购买实行搜查令制度,旨在限制政府获取公民信息。 联邦调查局拒绝提供有关其数据购买行为的进一步细节。

## FBI 位置数据购买:摘要 近期TechCrunch报道确认FBI正在购买美国公民的位置数据,引发了关于隐私和合法性的争论。核心问题并非直接的政府监控,而是复杂的多层数据市场。消费者应用程序嵌入广告SDK,将位置信号传输到广告交易所。监控公司随后收集这些数据——即使来自未中标的竞价——并将其传递给聚合商,再由聚合商出售给政府机构。 这种系统允许FBI通过购买合法“可获得”的商业数据来绕过搜查令要求。批评者强调缺乏问责制,因为每个中间方都声称只是在传递数据,并且很少验证用户同意。苹果和谷歌因与通过这种数据收集获利的应用程序分享收入而受到牵连。 评论员建议的解决方案范围从更严格的法规和推翻“第三方原则”到个人行动,例如卸载不必要的应用程序。人们也对潜在的外国行为者访问这些数据以及政府机构对宪法权利的漠视表示担忧,无论哪个政府。最终,讨论的中心是数据驱动世界中隐私的侵蚀,以及对个人信息更大的透明度和控制的需求。
相关文章

原文

The FBI has resumed purchasing reams of Americans’ data and location histories to aid federal investigations, the agency’s director, Kash Patel, testified to lawmakers on Wednesday.

This is the first time since 2023 that the FBI has confirmed it was buying access to people’s data collected from data brokers, who source much of their information — including location data — from ordinary consumer phone apps and games, per Politico. At the time, then-FBI director Christopher Wray told senators that the agency had bought access to people’s location data in the past but that it was not actively purchasing it.

When asked by U.S. Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat of Oregon, if the FBI would commit to not buying Americans’ location data, Patel said that the agency “uses all tools … to do our mission.”

“We do purchase commercially available information that is consistent with the Constitution and the laws under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act — and it has led to some valuable intelligence for us,” Patel testified Wednesday.

Wyden said buying information on Americans without obtaining a warrant was an “outrageous end-run around the Fourth Amendment,” referring to the constitutional law that protects people in America from device searches and data seizures.

When reached by TechCrunch, a spokesperson for the FBI declined to comment beyond Patel’s remarks, and did not provide answers to questions about the agency’s purchase of commercial data, including how often the FBI obtained location data and from which brokers.

Government agencies typically have to convince a judge to authorize a search warrant based on some evidence of a crime before they can demand private information about a person from a tech or phone company. But in recent years, U.S. agencies have skirted this legal step by purchasing commercially available data from companies that amass large amounts of people’s location data originally derived from phone apps or other commercial tracking technology.

For example, U.S. Customs and Border Protection purchased a tranche of data sourced from real-time bidding, or RTB, services, according to a document obtained by 404 Media. These technologies are central to the mobile and web advertising industry, and they collect information such as location and other identifiable data used to target people viewing ads. Surveillance firms can observe this process and gather information about a user’s location, and then potentially sell that data to brokers or federal agencies looking to circumvent the warrant process.

The FBI claims it does not need a warrant to use this information for federal investigations; though this legal theory has not yet been tested in court.

Last week, Wyden and several other lawmakers introduced a bipartisan, bicameral bill called the Government Surveillance Reform Act, which among other things would require a court-authorized warrant before federal agencies can buy Americans’ information from data brokers.

Updated with response from the FBI.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com