帕兰蒂尔扩大在英国政府的影响力,获得访问英国金融行为监管局(FCA)敏感数据的权限。
Palantir extends reach into British state as gets access to sensitive FCA data

原始链接: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/mar/22/palantir-extends-reach-into-british-state-as-it-gets-access-to-sensitive-fca-data

英国金融行为监管局(FCA)已授予美国数据分析公司Palantir一份每周超过3万英镑的合同,用于分析其金融犯罪情报数据。为期三个月的试用旨在提高FCA检测英国42,000家金融公司中欺诈、洗钱和内幕交易的能力。 该交易引发了隐私担忧,原因是Palantir的历史记录——包括与移民执法和以色列军队的合作——以及其联合创始人的政治关系。批评者担心敏感数据可能被滥用,包括来自消费者投诉和通信的个人信息,尽管FCA声明Palantir将作为其控制下的“数据处理者”行事,数据将存储在英国。 虽然专家承认人工智能可以增强金融犯罪检测能力,但数据安全和Palantir的伦理可靠性仍然存在疑问。FCA坚持认为已实施严格的控制措施,禁止Palantir将其用于产品培训,但人们仍然担心获得的信息可能被利用。 这份合同增加了Palantir已获得的5亿英镑以上英国公共部门合同,包括与国民医疗服务体系(NHS)和国防部。

## Palantir 获取英国金融数据访问权限 Palantir,这家备受争议的数据分析公司,正在扩大其在英国政府内的影响力,获得了金融行为监管局(FCA)持有的敏感数据访问权限。该合同旨在帮助FCA调查其内部情报数据,但引发了对隐私和数据安全的担忧。 Hacker News上的讨论显示,人们对英国打击洗钱的决心表示怀疑,一些人认为伦敦金融城受益于非法资金流动。人们对Palantir的部署模式以及潜在的无限制访问权限表示担忧,尽管该公司声称数据主权得到保障。 许多评论员强调了Palantir与政治圈内人士(如彼得·蒂尔)的联系,以及它与情报机构(包括中央情报局的资助)的历史。人们争论政治家们是否真正出于公共利益行事,还是受到游说和未来在Palantir等公司就业机会的影响。一些人表达了对企业权力日益增强,可能超越国家主权更广泛的担忧。 还有人指出了Palantir过去的一些可疑项目,例如与平民伤亡有关的定位系统。
相关文章

原文

Palantir is to be granted access to a trove of highly sensitive UK financial regulation data, in a deal that has prompted fresh concerns about the US AI company’s deepening reach into the British state, the Guardian can reveal.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has awarded Palantir a contract to investigate the watchdog’s internal intelligence data in an effort to help it tackle financial crime, which includes investigating fraud, money laundering and insider trading.

The Miami-based company, co-founded by the billionaire Donald Trump donor Peter Thiel, has been appointed for a three-month trial, paying more than £30,000 a week to analyse the FCA’s vast “data lake”, which could lead to a full procurement of an AI system.

The deal is part of the FCA’s drive to use digital intelligence to better focus resources on rule-breaking among the 42,000 financial services firms it regulates, from major banks to crypto exchanges.

There was only one other, unnamed competitor for the contract. Palantir already has more than £500m in UK public deals, including with the NHS, military and police.

The contract has prompted warnings of “very significant privacy concerns”. Palantir is expected to apply its AI system, known as Foundry, to huge quantities of information held by the watchdog, including case intelligence files marked highly sensitive; information on so-called problem firms; reports from lenders about proven and suspected frauds; and data about the public, including consumer complaints to the financial ombudsman.

The data includes recordings of phone calls, emails and trawls of social media posts, the Guardian understands. The FCA is one of several UK agencies which aim to stop financial crimes that underpin harms such as the drug trade and human trafficking.

The deal has raised concerns inside the FCA. One source said: “Once Palantir understands how we detect money-laundering threats, how do we know that they are ethically reliable enough not to go to share that information?”

Palantir’s technology is used by the Israeli military and in the US president’s ICE immigration crackdown, leading to leftwing MPs in the House of Commons last month to call it a “highly questionable” and “ghastly” company. In 2023 it signed a £330m deal with the NHS, which has sparked resistance from doctors, and a £240m contract with the Ministry of Defence in December 2025, which prompted MPs to highlight “reports of serious allegations of complicity in human rights violations and the undermining of democratic processes made against Palantir”.

Palantir has previously defended its work, saying it has led to about 99,000 extra operations being scheduled in the NHS, helped UK police tackle domestic violence and that it “takes a rigorous approach to respecting human rights”.

Prof Michael Levi, an internationally recognised expert in money laundering at Cardiff University, said there was “serious under-exploitation” of data held by financial regulators, so AI is a potentially valuable technology to tackle financial crimes. But he said it was “a relevant question as to whether Palantir’s owners might tipoff their friends about methodologies”.

“What are the protocols agreed between the FCA and Palantir about the onward use of things that they have learned in that process?” he said.

The FCA said that the terms of the contract meant Palantir would be a “data processor” not a “data controller” – meaning that it could only act on instruction from the regulator, which said it would retain exclusive control over the encryption keys for the most sensitive files and the data would be hosted and stored solely in the UK. Palantir will have to destroy data after completion of the contract and any intellectual property derived from the data trawling should be retained by the FCA.

The FCA considered using dummy data or scrambling company and individual names but decided using real data was the only worthwhile test, even though guidelines encourage the use of synthetic data in pilots.

“When the FCA carries out an enforcement investigation, it has powers to compel firms to hand over vast quantities of data,” said Christopher Houssemayne du Boulay, a partner and barrister at the law firm Hickman & Rose who specialises in defending serious and complex financial crime cases. “We could be talking about hundreds of whole email accounts and full financial records. Many innocent people will be caught up in that and the data may contain bank account details, email addresses, telephone numbers and other personal information.

“If you ingest that data and use it to train an AI system, there are very significant privacy concerns. There should be serious confidentiality requirements regarding what Palantir does with the data.”

The FCA said Palantir could not copy the data to train its products. Palantir referred a request for comment to the FCA.

A spokesperson for the FCA said: “Effective use of technology is vital in the fight against financial crime and helps us identify risks to the consumers we serve and markets we oversee. We ran a competitive procurement process and have strict controls in place to ensure data is protected.”

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com