一份令人不安的疲软报告...
A Disturbingly Weak Report...

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/disturbingly-weak-report

Peter Tchir 对最新非农就业报告的分析显示,尽管新增就业岗位 275,000 个,最初表现强劲,但结果却令人不安。 然而,他指出了过去两个月的一个令人不安的方面,因为向下修正导致就业数据减少了 167,000 人。 失业率上升,而劳动力参与率仍维持在较低水平。 尤其令人震惊的是,家庭调查数据显示,18.4万个工作岗位流失。 此外,与新冠疫情爆发前的统计数据相比,每小时收入有所下降,“聘用”率和“辞职”率均较低。 尽管更好的数据帮助美联储继续收紧政策,但泰勒·德登警告说,这些调查结果可能会给股​​市带来压力,特别是在最近企业盈利报告令人失望的情况下。 总体而言,这些数字表明美国经济形势疲软,包括债务压力,这可能会挑战关于赤字的传统假设。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Peter Tchir via Academy Securities,

As Non-Farm Payroll hit the tape, the report initially looked strong, adding 275,000 jobs!

But that is where the “goodness” ends. 

Downward revisions for the past 2 months were 167k! Making some (like me) wonder why we bother? Remember when last month seemed too strong? It was! Instead of 353k, we only got 229k (and why would we believe that next month, it won’t be revised down further?).

Then, unemployment ticked higher to 3.9%. Still a low level of unemployment, but that increase occurred while the labor participation rate stayed the same (at the somewhat low level of 62.5%). Which means, yes, you guessed it, the Household Survey showed job losses of 184k (bringing the 2-month total to over 200,000 jobs lost). Once again, on a brief glance, it looks like there were part-time jobs created, making the already weak report, even weaker.

Hourly earnings dropped (a good thing for bonds and inflation, a bad thing for workers).

The main thing I looked at earlier in the week with JOLTS was the “Quit” rate which came in at 2.1%, which was the lower than almost any point from 2016 to the end of 2019. Not impressive as it tells us that workers don’t think it is easy to find another job (and JOLTS is a month behind NFP in reporting). The “Hire” rate in JOLTS was at 3.6%, which is also at the lower end of the range in the years prior to COVID.

At best, this is a “normal” job market from historical standards. In reality, it is slightly below “normal” and heading the wrong direction (for the economy, if not monetary policy).

All of this would be less concerning if payment delinquencies on a wide variety of debt weren’t increasing (they are) and credit card debt wasn’t back above trend (it is), etc.

The initial reaction for bonds is lower yields. That seems reasonable, given the data, but I think after the State of the Union, as the “real” campaigning begins, we will realize that no one in D.C. cares about the deficit (how they grow it will vary, but it is going to keep growing) which will limit how much bonds can rally.

On the equity side, the initial reaction might be to rally as this data helps the Fed, but I think it is weak enough, that along with some recent earnings misses, pressure will be to the downside (I had to check 4 times to be sure, but the Nasdaq 100 closed lower on Thursday than it had last Friday – I had to check so often, because the headlines had me convinced it has been a great week, but it hasn’t).

So what initially looked like “good” news is actually mediocre, at best. How the markets treat that news remains to be seen, but I’m expecting a mediocre response, regardless of the fact that today’s data will help the Fed lean towards cuts.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com