路易斯维尔支付80万美元以应对对基督教摄影师的违宪要求。
Louisville Shells Out $800,000 For Unconstitutional Demands On Christian Photographer

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/louisville-shells-out-800000-unconstitutional-demands-christian-photographer

路易斯维尔,肯塔基州,已与摄影师切尔西·尼尔森达成和解,同意支付80万美元的律师费。尼尔森曾与该市的非歧视法进行法律斗争,该法律试图强迫她为同性婚姻拍照,她认为这侵犯了她的宗教和言论自由权利。 此案与杰克·菲利普斯等之前的冲突相呼应,并凸显了“蓝色城市”反复出现的模式,即试图强迫艺术家创作与其信仰相冲突的作品。虽然最高法院之前在类似案件中做出了有限的裁决,但其2023年在*303 Creative v. Elenis*案中的裁决——肯定了艺术表达的言论自由权利——被证明是关键。 法院在9月份的裁决中特别引用了*303 Creative*案,有效地阻止路易斯维尔执行其针对尼尔森的法令。该市的总成本,包括其自身的法律费用,可能高达数百万美元,这标志着尼尔森和捍卫自由联盟的重大胜利,并强化了言论自由和宗教自由的保护。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

The city of Louisville, Kentucky, has agreed to pay $800,000 in attorney fees to settle a case with a Christian photographer who fought to protect her religious and free speech rights over the years of litigation.

Louisville ultimately spent a fortune to force Chelsey Nelson to photograph same sex marriages under its nondiscrimination laws.

When combined with its own litigation costs, the case likely cost the city and the courts millions to deny Nelson her constitutional rights.

In prior columnsacademic articles, and my book, The Indispensable Right, I discussed the never-ending litigation targeting Jack Phillips, the Christian baker who declined to make cakes that violated his religious beliefs.

The case went all the way to the Supreme Court in what many of us hoped would be a final resolution of this conflict.

I had long criticized the framing of the case (and other cases) under the religious clauses rather than treating it as a matter of free speech.

In the end, the Supreme Court punted in a maddening 2018 decision that technically ruled in favor of Phillips based on a finding that the Commission showed anti-religious bias against Phillips.

In 2023, the Supreme Court delivered a major victory for free speech in 303 Creative v. Elenis, when it ruled that Lorie Smith, a Christian website designer, could refuse to provide services for a same-sex marriage.

Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote, “the framers designed the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to protect the ‘freedom to think as you will and to speak as you think.’ … They did so because they saw the freedom of speech ‘both as an end and as a means.’”

In the September ruling, the court cited 303 Creative:

“That 2023 decision confirmed this Court’s 2022 interpretation of the First Amendment to bar the City of Louisville from enforcing an ordinance prohibiting wedding photographer Chelsey Nelson from stating her traditional (now dissenting) views on traditional marriage or declining to participate in those ceremonies.”

Louisville is only the latest blue city to spend millions trying to force individuals to create products — from cakes to wedding albums — that violate their religious, speech, and associational rights.

The settlement is a victory not just for Nelson but also for the Alliance Defending Freedom.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com