Overview

TIPSv2 is the next generation of the TIPS family of foundational image-text encoders empowering strong performance across numerous multimodal and vision tasks. Our work starts by revealing a surprising finding, where distillation unlocks superior patch-text alignment over standard pretraining, leading to distilled student models significantly surpassing their much larger teachers in this capability. We carefully investigate this phenomenon, leading to an improved pretraining recipe that upgrades our vision-language encoder significantly. Three key changes are introduced to our pretraining process (illustrated in the figure below): iBOT++ extends the patch-level self-supervised loss to all tokens for stronger dense alignment; Head-only EMA reduces training cost while retaining performance; and Multi-Granularity Captions uses PaliGemma and Gemini descriptions for richer text supervision. Combining these components, TIPSv2 demonstrates strong performance across 9 tasks and 20 datasets, generally on par with or better than recent vision encoder models, with particularly strong gains in zero-shot segmentation.

TIPSv2 pretraining overview. TIPSv2 introduces 3 pretraining improvements: iBOT++ (enhanced MIM loss), Head-only EMA (memory-efficient self-supervised losses), and Multi-granularity captions (richer text supervision).

Visualization

PCA Feature Maps

TIPSv2 produces smoother feature maps with well-delineated objects compared to prior vision-language models (e.g., TIPS and SigLIP2). While DINOv3 also exhibits smooth feature maps, TIPSv2 shows stronger semantic focus: object boundaries are more precisely delineated and regions show granular semantic details. We compare ViT-g models of several vision encoders, except for DINOv3, where we compare with the 6× larger ViT-7B. Select an image below to explore PCA components of patch embeddings.

TIPSv2 PCA features demonstrate more fine-grained semantic separation: backpacks, people, and hiking poles are clearly delineated.

Feature Explorer

Upload your own image and explore TIPSv2 patch embeddings feature maps or applications in zero-shot segmentation or depth and normal prediction. Also available on HuggingFace.

Method

TIPSv2 investigates the differences between pre-training and distillation, motivating the introduction of three targeted pretraining improvements to standard vision-language models: iBOT++, Head-only EMA, and Multi-Granularity Text Captions.

Bridging Pre-training and Distillation

We reveal a surprising gap between pre-training and distillation: a smaller ViT-L model distilled from a larger ViT-g TIPS teacher dramatically outperforms its teacher in zero-shot segmentation, reversing the trend of all other evaluation tasks. We observe a similar trend in SigLIP2. In the paper, we ablate the differences between pre-training and distillation, such as masking ratio, encoder initialization, frozen or training parameters, and supervision. Our investigation reveals that the important distinction that causes differences in patch-text alignment between distillation and pre-training is supervision on visible tokens.

Distillation vs standard pretraining: surprising findings. Zero-shot segmentation for a TIPS ViT-g pre-trained teacher model and a ViT-L student distilled from the ViT-g teacher. The student model strongly surpasses the teacher for patch-text alignment.

iBOT++: Enhanced Masked Image Modeling

In our investigation of the gap between distillation and standard pretraining, we find that supervising visible patches is the key differentiator. To introduce this improvement in distillation to pretraining, we propose a simple augmentation: iBOT++. Whereas standard iBOT only supervises masked patch tokens, leaving visible token representations unconstrained, iBOT++ extends the patch-level self-distillation loss to all patches (both masked and visible), yielding a +14.1 mIoU gain in zero-shot segmentation on ADE150.

iBOT++. Applies the patch-level loss to all patches (masked and visible), dramatically improving patch-text alignment as shown by zero-shot segmentation results.

Head-only EMA

Since the contrastive loss already stabilizes the vision encoder, we apply EMA only to the projector head rather than the full model. This reduces training parameters by 42% while retaining comparable performance.

Head-only EMA. Reduces training parameters while maintaining performance.

Multi-Granularity Text Captions

We supplement alt-text and PaliGemma captions with richer Gemini Flash captions, randomly alternating between them during training to avoid shortcutting on coarse keywords. This boosts both dense and global image-text performance.

Multi-granularity captions. Image captions at different granularities.

Ablations

We ablate each component cumulatively from the TIPS baseline. iBOT++ alone yields the largest single gain: a +14.1 mIoU improvement in zero-shot segmentation on ADE150 (3.5 → 17.6), confirming that extending the patch-level loss to visible tokens is the key driver of dense patch-text alignment.

Ablation studies. Cumulative ablations from the TIPS baseline, each adding one TIPSv2 component on ViT-g.

Results

We evaluate TIPSv2 across a wide range of evaluation categories, including Dense Image-Text (zero-shot segmentation), Global Image-Text (classification and retrieval), and Image-Only tasks (segmentation, depth, normals, retrieval, classification). Select a tab below to explore the detailed results tables.

Dense Image-Text Global Image-Text Image-Only vs. DINOv3

Dense image-text evaluations. TIPSv2 achieves SOTA on all four zero-shot segmentation benchmarks, outperforming SILC and DINOv2 even though they use the more complex TCL evaluation protocols.

Global image-text evaluations. TIPSv2 achieves best or second-best in 5 of 7 global evaluations. Notably, TIPSv2-g outperforms PE-core G/14 on 3 of 5 shared evals, despite PE having 56% more parameters and 47× more training pairs.

Image-only evaluations. TIPSv2 achieves best or second-best in 7 of 9 image-only evaluations.

DINOv3 vs TIPSv2 comparison. We compare TIPSv2 with DINOv3 at the largest common size between the two families: ViT-L. Despite DINOv3's teacher using 6× more parameters and 15× more images, TIPSv2 wins 4 of 6 shared evaluations including zero-shot segmentation (both using sliding window protocol from TCL in this case).

Citation

@inproceedings{cao2026tipsv2,
  title     = {{TIPSv2: Advancing Vision-Language Pretraining with Enhanced Patch-Text Alignment}},
  author    = {Cao, Bingyi and Chen, Koert and Maninis, Kevis-Kokitsi and Chen, Kaifeng and Karpur, Arjun and Xia, Ye and Dua, Sahil and Dabral, Tanmaya and Han, Guangxing and Han, Bohyung and Ainslie, Joshua and Bewley, Alex and Jacob, Mithun and Wagner, Rene and Ramos, Washington and Choromanski, Krzysztof and Seyedhosseini, Mojtaba and Zhou, Howard and Araujo, Andre},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},
  year      = {2026}
}