英国《每日电讯报》称,年轻貌美的女性现已成为“极右翼”的新面孔。
UK's Telegraph Claims Attractive Young Women Are Now The New Face Of The 'Far-Right'

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/uks-telegraph-claims-attractive-young-women-are-now-new-face-far-right

《每日电讯报》近期一篇报道指出,“极右翼”运动正被一群“上镜”的年轻女性重塑,她们通过社交媒体反对大规模移民和多元文化主义。文章介绍了阿达·卢赫(Ada Lluch)、瓦伦蒂娜·戈麦斯(Valentina Gomez)和伊娃·弗拉丁格布鲁克(Eva Vlaardingerbroek)等人物,她们近期被禁止进入英国参加汤米·罗宾逊(Tommy Robinson)的集会并发表演讲。 该文作者认为,主流媒体对这些女性采取了居高临下的态度,暗示她们不过是骗子或被操纵的傀儡,而非拥有真实政治信念的个体。批评人士通过《每日电讯报》的文章,将焦点对准这些活动人士的外貌及其“美化”策略,试图以此否定其传达信息的深度。 摘要强调了基尔·斯塔默(Keir Starmer)政府治下所存在的双重标准:一方面封杀这些异见声音,另一方面对其他抗议团体却显得较为宽容。作者认为,建制派对这些女性外在形象的执着,反映出其内心更深层的恐慌——即意识到年轻、口才出众且符合传统审美取向的女性正在拒绝主流政治叙事。文章最后断言,将健康的爱国异见贴上“极右翼极端主义”的标签,是现状维护者在公众幻灭感日益增长之际,为维持控制而采取的绝望之举。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

The Telegraph has published a piece so tone-deaf it reads like self-parody. According to the outlet, the “far-right” is no longer the domain of bald men in boots and tattoos. No, it’s now being led by “strikingly telegenic young women” who dare to look good on camera while warning about mass migration, grooming gangs, and cultural replacement.

Three foreign activists – Ada Lluch, Valentina Gomez, and Eva Vlaardingerbroek – were banned from entering Britain for a Tommy Robinson rally, and the Telegraph can’t stop gushing over how “pretty” this makes the movement look.

The government has banned at least seven foreign voices from attending the rally, including the women highlighted by the Telegraph.

Critics point out the blatant double standard: pro-Palestine marches with openly extremist rhetoric are often tolerated, while a native-focused demonstration drawing tens or hundreds of thousands draws preemptive visa blocks on speakers.

Kier Starmer’s government waves in unvetted migrants and certain extremists but draws the line at articulate critics of mass migration.

The Telegraph profiles the banned women in breathless detail. Catalan activist Ada Lluch has called out “complete invasion” of western democracies, American influencer Valentina Gomez warned about “rapist Muslims taking over,” and Dutch commentator Eva Vlaardingerbroek spoke of “the rape, replacement and murder of our people.”

All three were barred from the UK, along with several other activists. Meanwhile, the government continues to wave in the very people these women are warning about.

The Telegraph also warns about attractive home-grown women, including British influencer Saskia Teague. With over 100,000 Instagram followers, she mixes “happy happy happy” selfies with calls for “England for the English,” mass deportations, and an end to shame-free multiculturalism.

The Telegraph acts shocked that she also praises her “Anglo-Saxon hair” and rejects the idea she’s being “used” by men.

Of course the usual suspects are wheeled out to clutch pearls. Hope Not Hate researcher Alex MacKinnon calls it a “glamorisation” effort to shed the “violent thug image.” Institute for Strategic Dialogue’s Hannah Rose says looking desirable builds followers and fits the ideology that women should be “aesthetically pleasing.”

The implication is that these women can’t possibly believe what they’re saying – they must be grifting or being manipulated. Because in the eyes of the legacy media, no normal young attractive woman could possibly notice what’s happening to her country.

This is the same media that files stories on “far-right” threat while ignoring grooming gang scandals, no-go zones, and skyrocketing violence against women and girls. The Telegraph even admits the shift comes from young people “profoundly disaffected with mainstream parties” and disillusioned with modern life.

Yet instead of asking why that disillusionment exists, they obsess over Instagram filters and “zhuzhing” the image.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer has today claimed he’s all about “championing peaceful protest” while simultaneously blocking entry to those he dislikes. Starmer declared:

“I’ll always champion peaceful protest. But the Unite the Kingdom march organisers are peddling hatred and division,” then admitting that “We’ve already blocked visas for far-right agitators who want to come here to spew their extremist views.”

Why are intelligent women who take care over their appearance being maligned as ‘far right’? Well, take at look at this lot:

It’s no wonder they’re rattled. That’s the clownworld alternative the establishment promotes – and it terrifies them that normal, feminine, attractive women are rejecting it in favour of common sense.

This is also the same tired playbook the left has run for years. Remember when the likes of MSNBC insisted health and fitness was the “new gateway drug to the far-right”? Even basic self-improvement triggers the mob. Now being attractive, articulate, and female while opposing open borders gets you labelled “far-right agitator.” Apparently only frumpy, blue-haired nose ring radicals are allowed to have political opinions.

X users were not impressed with the Telegraph writer’s take.

The left’s panic is understandable. When healthy, fit, attractive people start rejecting open borders and woke insanity, the narrative collapses. Being patriotic, noticing patterns, and wanting your country to survive is not “far-right.” It’s normal.

The real extremists are the ones importing chaos, silencing dissent, and branding beauty, fitness, and common sense as threats. The more they smear, the more people wake up.

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com