法官拒绝阻止特朗普关于邮寄投票的行政令
Judge Declines To Block Trump's Order On Mail-In Voting

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/judge-declines-block-trumps-order-mail-voting

联邦法官卡尔·尼科尔斯驳回了民主党人阻止唐纳德·特朗普总统签署的旨在限制邮寄投票的行政命令的请求。该命令指示国土安全部编制成年美国公民名单,并指示美国邮政署提议相关规则,要求仅允许名单上的个人进行邮寄投票。 以参议院少数党领袖查克·舒默为首的原告方辩称,该命令越权,且所依据的数据存在缺陷,可能剥夺合格选民的投票权。然而,尼科尔斯法官裁定,这一法律挑战为时尚早,因为政府尚未建立创建或传输这些公民名单的基础设施,也未实施任何最终规则。 尽管法院的裁决允许政府目前继续执行该命令,但法官指出,如果未来的机构行动造成实际损害或名单被正式实施,原告可以重新提出禁令请求。随着政府推进该政策,相关诉讼将继续进行。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times,

A federal judge on May 28 allowed President Donald Trump's administration to implement an executive order imposing restrictions on mail-in voting.

U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols, based in Washington, rejected a request from Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), for an injunction against the order.

US President Donald Trump walks towards the Rose Garden for a "Rose Garden Club" dinner in honor of Police Week at the White House in Washington, DC, on May 11, 2026. Photo by Kent NISHIMURA / AFP via Getty Images

Absent an injunction, the federal government would compile lists of U.S. citizens and would coerce states into only allowing people on the lists to register to vote and vote in elections, even though the sources for the list are known to be deficient, plaintiffs argued in court filings.

Nichols disagreed, writing in a 26-page decision that while the order directed federal officials to compile the lists, it "does not mandate any action by a State once a List has been transmitted to it, and in any event, no infrastructure for compilation or transmission of the Lists has been established."

The situation may change if the U.S. Postal Service issues a final rule affecting plaintiffs, or if the government develops lists that erroneously omit certain individuals, the judge said.

"Plaintiffs may, of course, renew their motions if and when those future actions occur," he wrote. "Until then, however, Plaintiffs cannot show that preliminary injunctive relief is warranted."

The development means Trump and the federal government can implement the order, but the case will continue.

Trump signed the order on March 31. It states that only U.S. citizens can vote in federal elections and that new measures were necessary to "enhance election integrity" for mail-in ballots, which have become increasingly used in recent years.

It directed the secretary of homeland security to compile lists of adult citizens living in each state and to transmit the lists to each state. It also said that the U.S. Postal Service shall propose new rules specifying that all ballots must be mailed in envelopes marked for elections, and that the service "shall not transmit mail-in or absentee ballots from any individual unless those individuals" are on the citizenship lists.

"The cheating on mail-in voting is legendary. It's horrible what has been going on," Trump said when signing the order. "If you don't have honest voting, you can't have, really, a nation."

Democrats said the order exceeded a president's authority and disrupted state oversight of elections.

"President Trump has tried again and again to rewrite election rules for his own perceived partisan advantage," their complaint said, noting that a similar order from Trump, signed in 2025, has been blocked by courts.

Government lawyers told Nichols in a recent filing that the litigation was premature, given that agencies had not taken any steps to implement the order.

A woman casts her mail-in vote at an official ballot drop box in Washington on Nov. 5, 2024. Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times
联系我们 contact @ memedata.com