Adafruit 收到 Flux.ai 委托 Fenwick 律师事务所发出的律师函。
Adafruit receives demand letter from Fenwick legal counsel on behalf of Flux.ai

原始链接: https://blog.adafruit.com/

2026年5月22日,Adafruit收到来自Flux(由前联邦调查局幕僚长乔纳森·F·伦兹纳代理)的法律函件,试图阻止其发布一篇质疑Flux在知识产权、商业成就及用户指标方面主张的文章。该函件还指控其违反了《计算机欺诈与滥用法》。 Adafruit坚持认为其报道涉及公共安全利益,并通过负责任的披露协议进行,并指出所有获取的信息均因Flux的服务器配置错误而处于公开可见状态。尽管Adafruit“强烈拒绝”这些法律威胁,但该公司已暂时停止博客运营,以决定后续步骤。随着事态发展,将向社区提供进一步更新。

Adafruit 近日披露,他们收到了一封来自 Flux.ai 的法律函,指控其涉嫌违反《计算机欺诈与滥用法案》(CFAA)。Adafruit 表示,他们在进行负责任的漏洞披露过程中,仅仅是访问了因服务器配置错误而公开的信息。 Hacker News 社区的反应对 Adafruit 一边倒地支持,认为其作为开源硬件社区的长期支柱,其行为并无不妥。相反,评论者对 Flux.ai 表示了强烈质疑,指责其产品性能不佳、存在激进的“订阅地狱”收费模式,且缺乏透明度。许多用户表示在争议发生前从未听说过 Flux.ai,并指出这引发了“史翠珊效应”,即法律威胁对 Flux.ai 造成的声誉损害,远超事件本身可能带来的影响。 评论者还讨论了“氛围编程”(vibe coding)和人工智能驱动的 EDA 工具的伦理问题。许多工程师认为,人工智能目前难以应对硬件设计和调试的复杂性,与确定性工具相比,往往沦为一种昂贵且不可靠的“黑箱”。Adafruit 表示近期会分享事情的完整经过,而 Flux.ai 尚未对此公开置评。
相关文章

原文

limor fried & phillip torrone

Adafruit received at 10:38 p.m. ET on May 22, 2026 a letter from former FBI chief of staff, Jonathan F. Lenzner, and partner at Fenwick & West LLP, counsel for Flux, demanding, among other things, that Adafruit refrain from publishing an article addressing what the letter characterizes as false and potentially defamatory claims about Flux, including statements about Flux’s intellectual property, commercial traction and user base.

The letter further asserts claims under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Adafruit accessed only information that Flux’s own systems made publicly available through a server misconfiguration. Adafruit’s reporting concerns a matter of public security interest and was conducted in the ordinary course of responsible disclosure.

Although Adafruit vigorously rejects the assertions made in Flux’s May 22, 2026 demand letter, we have temporarily stopped publishing on the Adafruit blog while we consider our response and next steps.

We will update the community as appropriate.

The Adafruit press contact is: [email protected]

-ladyada & pt

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com