亨利·诺瓦克遇害后,国际特赦组织谴责右翼“政治评论”
After Murder Of Henry Nowak, Amnesty International Condemns Right Wing 'Political Commentary'

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/after-murder-henry-nowak-amnesty-international-condemns-right-wing-political-commentary

大赦国际因其对亨利·诺瓦克(Henry Nowak)遇刺身亡事件的反应而面临强烈抵制。诺瓦克在南安普敦被人捅伤致死,批评者对该组织无视警方极具争议的行为感到愤怒,特别是警员拒绝向这名多次表示自己被捅伤且呼吸困难的垂死者提供帮助,反而去谴责围绕该案件的“政治评论”。 包括瑞典籍欧洲议会议员查理·魏默斯(Charlie Weimers)在内的观察人士称该组织“道德破产”且存在偏见,并指出这与他们在乔治·弗洛伊德(George Floyd)案件中所表现出的激进主义形成了双重标准。虽然大赦国际此前对围绕弗洛伊德事件的骚乱和政治言论保持沉默,但现在却积极监管有关诺瓦克谋杀案的公众舆论。批评者认为,该非政府组织将其意识形态议程置于人权之上,尤其是因为警方据称优先采信了肇事者的说法,而肇事者指控受害者有种族歧视行为。这一事件加剧了公众的不满,并促使鲁珀特·洛(Rupert Lowe)等人士呼吁恢复死刑,这一提议也得到了埃隆·马斯克(Elon Musk)的支持。批评者认为,大赦国际的立场不仅是在掩护警方逃避问责,也凸显了该组织与公众的脱节。

相关文章

原文

Via Remix News,

Amnesty International’s reaction to the murder of Henry Nowak has prompted outrage, with the organization having nothing to say about the atrocious and inhumane actions of the police during the incident, but sharply condemning the “political commentary” in the wake of Nowak’s death.

“At a time when hate crimes are rising, and violence and fear are becoming a daily reality for people of colour and migrants, calls for ‘cold, hard rage’ are completely reckless. Henry Nowak’s murder is an awful tragedy and his family have said “we do not want his death to be used to create further division, hatred or tension”. The very least politicians can do is respect that,” wrote Amnesty International.

Not everyone is happy about Amnesty International’s remarks on the case, which has up until now, said nothing about the manner in which the police handcuffed a dying Nowak as he bled out from eight stab wounds.

Swedish MEP Charlie Weimers wrote on X, “Amnesty has been morally bankrupt for a long time. A pure left-wing organization."

He was responding to a comment from Lauren Chen, who wrote:

“Incredible statement from Amnesty International UK on Henry Nowak: Not a single word of conveying outrage or horror over the brutal murder, or of how police left him to die without dignity. Instead, their statement is about policing the political commentary around the case. I kid you not. What a grotesque betrayal of any moral purpose.These NGOs aren’t just useless – they actively despise you. They are hostile to everything you value and everything you hold dear.”

Amnesty International, however, is known for its pro-migration and left-wing stances and has a long history of funding from the Open Society Foundation of George Soros. Nevertheless, the organization is often critical of police conduct, which makes it all the more remarkable that the organization has nothing to say about the police’s actions in this case.

The Southampton officers in the case disregarded Nowak’s pleas for help while immediately taking the claims of Vickrum Digwa, who said Nowak made racist comments to him, at face value. Notably, Nowak told the police multiple times that he had been stabbed and warned them: “I can’t breathe.” When he told the officer he had been stabbed, the officer replied, “I don’t think you have, mate.”

At the same time, the murder weapon was given to his mother, and police later found it at the family home along with more than 20 other weapons. His mother is due to be sentenced for removing the murder weapon from the crime scene.

The Nowak case has many parallels with the George Floyd case, where Police Officer Derek Chauvin was controversially convicted for murdering Floyd after placing him in handcuffs and kneeling on his back while Floyd said, “I can’t breathe.” Although the left weaponized the case, sparking mass riots the resulted in billions of damage across the United States, Amnesty International never condemned the left’s political rhetoric in the Floyd case. The Soros-funded organization also never condemned the mass riots, which left stores and homes burned out across major American cities.

If anything, Amnesty International’s “political commentary” around the case only served to inflame tensions and put vulnerable communities under further threat.

This double standard has not been lost on English protesters, who gathered in the streets and chanted “I can’t breathe,” at police officers in Southhampton yesterday, before unrest broke out. Notably, no shops were burned and no businesses harmed during the small-scale unrest — a far cry from the mass riots following Floyd’s death.

The murder of Nowak had sparked anger across Britain, but parties on the right, in particular, have been the most critical. Amnesty International appears unhappy that political commentators are pointing out the racial double-standard at work, including the police immediately taking the side of the murderer because he cried, “racist.”

Meanwhile, the leader of Restore Britain, Rupert Lowe, is making headlines for his call to return the death penalty for killers like Digwa.

His proposal has now received backing from Elon Musk.

All of this explains Amnesty’s position and why that organization will never try to hold the police accountable for their actions in the Nowak murder case.

Read more here...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com