GrapheneOS 用户因使用 GrapheneOS 被举报至当局。
GrapheneOS user reported to authorities for using GrapheneOS

原始链接: https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/36134-grapheneos-user-reported-to-authorities-for-using-grapheneos

为了保护您的隐私与尊严,作者提倡一种“双设备”策略。请使用一台安全且注重隐私的设备(例如搭载 GrapheneOS 的手机)处理日常个人事务,并确保其与您的真实身份完全隔离。 对于必须进行身份验证的政府应用程序或服务,请使用另一台廉价的“备用机”。该设备不应包含任何个人数据,如联系人、电子邮件或社交软件,仅将其视为“数字护照”。 最终,作者呼吁消费者保持理性与原则。如果某项服务、游戏或平台要求侵入性的身份验证,请拒绝妥协。通过拒绝以隐私换取娱乐或便利,您可以促使企业尊重用户的边界。如果某项服务不值得您舍弃匿名性,那么换个爱好就好。

Hacker News 最近的一篇讨论指出,一名 GrapheneOS 用户仅仅因为使用这款注重隐私的操作系统,就遭到了英国当局的标记。 社区对此反应强烈,大多持怀疑和批评态度。许多用户进行了讽刺性的类比,将针对隐私保护软件的行为比作将使用汽车或互联网本身定为犯罪。一些参与者认为,此类报道可能被夸大了,或者是政府主导的一种“侧面施压”,而非基于证据的正式调查。 虽然部分人讨论了将特定软件作为犯罪意图指标是否有效,但更广泛的舆论反映出人们对英国正滑向威权监控国家的深切担忧。讨论还简要延伸到了其他相关议题,包括 Yoti 等第三方年龄验证系统的隐私影响。总之,舆论普遍感到惊恐,用户认为这一事件属于越权行为,将个人隐私工具与犯罪活动混为一谈。
相关文章

原文

This is why people should buy a cheap phone with stock android on which zero private data is stored and that is never used for anything other than those verification things or government apps that might be or become mandatory.

What i mean is, use your graphene phone for everything, but don't use it to legitimate yourself.

Take an old phone or cheap one and put nothing on it, no contacts, no email (maybe one exclusively used for this phone without any private conversation on it), no apps like messengers and so on.

A phone that is only used like a passport, to legitimate yourself and or use government apps you are forced to use.

And of course think twice if a stupid game console is worth it to verify yourself to whomever.

People need to make mature decisions. If a company wants you to do something you don't want to do, then don't buy their products.

I mean, whether it's gaming, video streaming or adult entertainment, is this really something that stands above your privacy and dignity? If they want you to identify to use it, look for new hobbies instead.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com