GrapheneOS 用户因使用 GrapheneOS 被举报至当局。
GrapheneOS user reported to authorities for using GrapheneOS

原始链接: https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/36134-grapheneos-user-reported-to-authorities-for-using-grapheneos

为了保护您的隐私与尊严,作者提倡一种“双设备”策略。请使用一台安全且注重隐私的设备(例如搭载 GrapheneOS 的手机)处理日常个人事务,并确保其与您的真实身份完全隔离。 对于必须进行身份验证的政府应用程序或服务,请使用另一台廉价的“备用机”。该设备不应包含任何个人数据,如联系人、电子邮件或社交软件,仅将其视为“数字护照”。 最终,作者呼吁消费者保持理性与原则。如果某项服务、游戏或平台要求侵入性的身份验证,请拒绝妥协。通过拒绝以隐私换取娱乐或便利,您可以促使企业尊重用户的边界。如果某项服务不值得您舍弃匿名性,那么换个爱好就好。

Hacker News 上近期的一篇报道称,年龄验证公司 Yoti 会自动向“有关当局”举报使用 GrapheneOS 的用户。这则源自 Reddit 用户的故事引发了关于数字隐私、政府越权以及公民自由衰落(尤其是在英国)的激烈辩论。 评论者对该故事的真实性持不同意见;一些人认为截图可能是伪造的模板回复,而另一些人则认为这种监视是英国日益严苛的网络安全法规的必然结果。讨论迅速演变为对“双重标准”治安、监控文化以及西方民主国家言论自由受损的广泛批评。 许多用户表示,使用安全且注重隐私的操作系统被定性为“可疑”或犯罪行为,这令他们感到沮丧。另一些人则争论美国和英国目前哪个更“反乌托邦”,参与者分享了边境盘问的经历,并讨论了在科技公司和政府将控制权置于用户权利之上的世界里,维持隐私变得日益不可能。归根结底,该讨论串反映了精通技术的用户对数字自主权未来的日益悲观。
相关文章

原文

This is why people should buy a cheap phone with stock android on which zero private data is stored and that is never used for anything other than those verification things or government apps that might be or become mandatory.

What i mean is, use your graphene phone for everything, but don't use it to legitimate yourself.

Take an old phone or cheap one and put nothing on it, no contacts, no email (maybe one exclusively used for this phone without any private conversation on it), no apps like messengers and so on.

A phone that is only used like a passport, to legitimate yourself and or use government apps you are forced to use.

And of course think twice if a stupid game console is worth it to verify yourself to whomever.

People need to make mature decisions. If a company wants you to do something you don't want to do, then don't buy their products.

I mean, whether it's gaming, video streaming or adult entertainment, is this really something that stands above your privacy and dignity? If they want you to identify to use it, look for new hobbies instead.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com