马萨诸塞州在新的隐私权法案中禁止出售精确位置数据。
Massachusetts bans sale of precise location data in new privacy rights bill

原始链接: https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/08/massachusetts-votes-to-pass-new-privacy-rights-bill-that-bans-sale-of-precise-location-data/

马萨诸塞州议会已全票通过《消费者数据隐私法案》。该法案是一项里程碑式的立法,预计将由州长签署生效。该法案赋予了居民新的权利,使其能够访问并删除大型科技公司以及处理超过 10 万名消费者信息的中型企业所持有的个人数据。 该法案的一个显著特点是全面禁止出售精确的地理位置数据——此类行为常被数据经纪人利用,以进行广告投放、政府监控或恶意目的的追踪。该法律还强制规定,企业在处理生物识别、基因和健康数据,以及有关宗教、移民身份和性取向等敏感信息前,必须获得用户的明确同意。 通过确立这些严格的规定,马萨诸塞州加入了美国各州不断扩大的行列,在联邦层面缺乏相关立法的情况下,自行制定地方性的隐私保护措施。隐私倡导者及美国公民自由联盟(ACLU)等民权团体对这一举措表示赞赏,称其为反对数字监控的重大胜利,也是遏制大型科技公司无节制数据收集行为的重要一步。

马萨诸塞州正在推进一项立法,旨在禁止销售精确的消费者位置数据,这反映了全美范围内加强州级隐私保护的趋势。与加利福尼亚州近期扩大隐私保护的举措类似,这一运动旨在遏制数据经纪人从智能手机和联网车辆中收集并交易敏感信息的普遍且往往不透明的做法。 《黑客新闻》(Hacker News)上的讨论强调了该法案潜在有效性的几个关键点: * **执行方面的担忧:** 许多批评者认为,该法案因依赖州总检察长执行,而非赋予公民个人诉讼权,导致其缺乏足够的“威慑力”。怀疑论者担心,如果没有个人起诉的能力,该法律可能只会流于形式。 * **“销售”漏洞:** 人们担心,企业可能会通过“共享”或“转移”数据——而非直接销售——来规避监管。 * **数据最小化:** 用户强调,真正的隐私需要做到数据最小化(即总体上减少数据收集),而不仅仅是限制所收集信息的销售。 * **企业策略:** 专家指出,随着越来越多的州采用这些标准,企业最终可能会在全国范围内默认采取最高合规级别,以避免在复杂的监管碎片化中运营所带来的法律风险。
相关文章

原文

Massachusetts lawmakers have voted to pass privacy protections that grant the state’s residents new rights over accessing and deleting their data held by big tech giants. The bill also bans companies from selling their users’ precise location data.

Lawmakers in the Massachusetts House passed the state’s Consumer Data Privacy Act in a unanimous 146-0 vote on Thursday, months after all of the Senate’s 40 lawmakers voted in favor of advancing its own bill in September. Now, the bills will be combined in the Senate, and sent to the state governor’s office, where it is expected to be signed into law. It’s not immediately clear when that will happen.

The move makes Massachusetts the latest U.S. state to push for stronger consumer privacy rights after years of documented abuses by the wider technology, advertising, and social media industries. While the United States does not have a nationwide privacy law, unlike many of the world’s major democracies, U.S. states have filled the void of legislation by bringing their own patchwork of privacy rules that apply to their states.

The bill, if passed into law, will apply to companies that handle or process the personal data of more than 100,000 consumers. It will largely affect medium-sized startups as well as Silicon Valley technology titans.

The law would block the sharing or sale of sensitive information without a user’s explicit consent. This data includes biometrics (such as health data, genetic information, and fingerprints), their precise geolocation data, and other markers about their religion, immigration status, and sexual orientation.

The collection and sale of people’s location data has been a major flashpoint in privacy debates for years. Data brokers have for years relied on app developers selling their users’ location data to repackage and sell it to anyone who can pay, including stalkers, governments, and militaries. In many cases, the government says it does not need a warrant to purchase data that’s commercially available on the open marketplace. 

The Biden administration came close to banning the sale of Americans’ sensitive data at the federal level, but the Trump government has since scrapped the change

By applying the location data ban to both residents and visitors, the Massachusetts law will effectively blanket-ban the sale of location data across the state. The bill is anticipated to have a broad effect on startups that collect, share, and sell location data in Massachusetts, as well as advertising companies that use location data to target people with ads.

According to local media WBUR and Massachusetts newspaper Lynn Journal, state lawmakers worked across party lines under the belief that privacy is a fundamental right to Massachusetts state residents.

The bill was generally praised by privacy groups and advocates.

Evan Greer, director of the Fight for the Future advocacy group, said the Massachusetts bill “took a major step toward cracking down on Big Tech’s surveillance abuses,” while the ACLU praised the landmark bill as positioning the state as a “leader in protecting personal privacy and curbing digital surveillance.”

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com