法院记录应当免费
Court Records Should Be Free

原始链接: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/06/court-records-should-be-free

电子前沿基金会(EFF)及一个广泛的倡导团体联盟正推动《2026年公开法院法案》的通过。该法案旨在彻底改革联邦司法系统过时的电子归档系统(PACER)。目前,该系统向公众收取高额费用以获取由纳税人资助的法庭记录。 尽管这些记录属于公开文件,但通过PACER的限制性付费墙,每年产生超过1.5亿美元的收入。这构成了透明度的障碍,对低收入群体的影响尤为严重。拟议的法案旨在用一个现代化、安全且用户友好的系统取代老旧的PACER和CM/ECF平台,并完全取消这些费用。 通过优先考虑可访问性、网络安全并降低长期成本,《公开法院法案》力求实现司法技术的现代化,并坚持民主原则,即公众应能免费、无阻碍地获取影响其生活的法律裁决。支持者认为,消除这些经济障碍对于问责制以及将联邦法院系统带入21世纪至关重要。

最近 Hacker News 上的一场讨论强调了让法院记录免费并向公众开放的持续运动,并援引了一篇关于该主题的电子前哨基金会(EFF)文章。 参与者讨论了弥补访问差距的现有解决方案,特别是 **CourtListener** 和 **Recap** 项目,后者通过众包方式收集此前被付费购买的 PACER 文档,并免费提供给其他人使用。虽然一些用户争论“免费”应该适用于人类还是机器,但另一些人指出了像 Courtwatch.us 这样的现有倡议。 谈话还涉及了实现司法数字基础设施现代化的立法努力。各方普遍认为,目前老旧的 PACER 和 CM/ECF 系统已经过时且效率低下。许多人希望拟议中的升级——例如过渡到现代化的统一平台——能通过默认公开免费记录,最终使目前的变通方法成为历史。
相关文章

原文

Court records belong to the public. Yet anyone seeking access to federal court filings through PACER, a government software system that stands for Public Access to Court Electronic Records, is usually required to pay hefty fees to search for and view documents. PACER’s fees have long acted as a barrier that makes it hard, especially for low income people, to see and understand the work produced by our own public servants. 

That's why EFF joined a broad group of organizations supporting the Open Courts Act of 2026, legislation that would modernize the federal courts' electronic filing systems and eliminate PACER fees. 

The bill would replace the aging PACER and CM/ECF systems with a modern, unified platform designed to improve public access, strengthen cybersecurity, and reduce long-term costs. Supporters note that PACER currently collects more than $150 million annually in fees from the public, despite court records being public documents.

The Open Courts Act would also make court records easier to find, access, and understand. The legislation builds on a similar proposal, also supported by EFF, that previously won bipartisan support in the Senate Judiciary Committee but did not become law before the end of the congressional session.

This is not a new issue for EFF. More than a decade ago, we criticized PACER's paywalls and the removal of some court records from online access, arguing that the public should not have to pay to read the law and the judicial decisions that shape it. The Open Courts Act would move U.S. courts a big step closer to that goal. 

In addition to EFF, the bill is supported by Fix the Court, the group pushing this bill forward; the Free Law Project, which maintains RECAP, software that has created a large archive of legal opinions and other court records; as well as civil society groups, open government watchdogs, and media groups. 

Public access to the courts is a cornerstone of democratic accountability. Let’s eliminate unnecessary barriers to court records, and bring the federal judiciary’s tech into the modern era. 

  • Read the full letter supporting the Open Courts Act of 2026
联系我们 contact @ memedata.com