亨特议员:反对选民身份证件的种族论调是“侮辱性的”
Rep. Hunt: Racial Argument Against Voter ID Is 'Insulting'

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/rep-hunt-racial-argument-against-voter-id-insulting

得克萨斯州共和党众议员韦斯利·亨特(Wesley Hunt)近期敦促国会通过《保护美国选民资格法案》(SAVE Act),该法案要求选民在投票时提供公民身份证明。在演讲中,亨特严厉批评了民主党对选民身份认证法的反对,称其论点体现了“低期望的软偏见”。 亨特驳斥了关于要求身份认证具有歧视性或种族主义色彩的说法,认为这种断言是对黑人和棕色人种的居高临下。他强调,从登机到使用政府服务,照片身份证明早已是日常活动的标准要求。结合自身经历,他将那种认为少数群体无法获取身份证的暗示斥为既侮辱人又缺乏事实依据。 文章认为,民主党抵制选民身份认证并非出于对民权或像吉姆·克劳法案那样的历史不公的担忧,而是为了维持选举优势。作者指出,这场辩论的核心在于根本分歧:共和党主张进行安全、透明的选举,而民主党则被指责为维持政治权力而破坏共和体制的完整性。亨特最后呼吁同僚通过支持《保护美国选民资格法案》,将选举安全置于优先地位。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Catherine Salgado via PJMedia.com,

Rep. Wesley Hunt (R-Texas) emphasized to Congress the importance of passing the election integrity SAVE America Act and rejected woke arguments against voter ID as racist and condescending.

Democrats’ idiotic arguments against requiring ID to vote include claiming that black Americans are somehow mysteriously unable to get IDs. Aside from the obvious elitism and racial prejudice of such a claim, it is practically impossible to live in America and not have identification. They are required at doctor’s offices, airports, bars, liquor stores, car rentals, welfare programs, and many more places. But somehow expecting IDs at polling places is unreasonable? 

Hunt sarcastically said, “I've been black for my entire life. I had to bring up the most racist thing I've ever heard [which] is the insinuation by Democrats that black and brown Americans are too stupid to get an ID to vote, just like everybody else.”

The congressman continued, “I call this the soft bigotry of low expectations. Figuring out how to vote in this country is a very low bar, and we could all figure it out regard of your race, religion, color, or creed, and we should all want free and fair elections.” 

Except Democrats know they cannot win so many elections as they do without fraud, nor can they expand their control to new areas. They have no positive results to run on, no record of making any city or state more prosperous and more free. They need fraud to survive.

Hunt told Congress, “With me today — I'm not gonna pull mine out this time, but I have six forms of government-issued ID. How did I acquire that? Personal responsibility in this country. I've also heard a lot about Jim Crow here today. I'm here to tell you, Jim Crow is over, and I know it because my parents grew up in it.”

Democrats were the party of Jim Crow, ironically. But now they scream “racism” whenever anyone points out that they are pushing an awful policy.

Democrats cheapen and exploit the suffering their predecessors caused for political reasons.

As Hunt said, “And I think it's actually insulting to those that actually experienced the ills of Jim Crow” to compare getting an ID to that era.

“Having an ID to vote in our national election should be a requirement, which is why I stand [here] today, urging my colleagues on the left to support this bill. If you want secure elections, if you want your vote to count, vote for the Save Act.”

Unfortunately, that’s precisely what Democrats don’t want.

This debate was never about IDs, or about black Americans’ access to IDs, or about constitutionality.

It was always about one political party believing in our Republic’s system of elections, and the other party hating our Republic’s system of government and believing they should decide who our leaders are instead of We the People.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com