罗恩·保罗:特朗普结束伊朗战争的尝试激怒了“一党制”集团
Ron Paul: Trump's Attempt To End The Iran War Infuriates The Uniparty

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/ron-paul-trumps-attempt-end-iran-war-infuriates-uniparty

罗恩·保罗(Ron Paul)认为,美伊之间目前的谅解备忘录是朝着结束一场他所描述的违宪且灾难性的冲突所迈出的罕见且积极的一步。他主张,特朗普总统为局势降温的努力,揭露了华盛顿两党合流的“单一政党”本质,即他们偏好永久战争。 保罗强调,新保守主义共和党人和建制派民主党人都因特朗普寻求和平而对他进行攻击,这表明政治建制派更热衷于冲突而非外交解决。他指出其中的讽刺之处:目前的所谓“突破”仅仅是恢复了美国单方面退出伊核协议(JCPOA)之前的现状,而这期间耗费了巨额纳税人的金钱并造成了人员伤亡。 尽管保罗对导致目前局面的道路持批评态度,但他敦促“和平派”在这些敏感的谈判期间不要攻击政府。他认为,由于总统正受到来自各方主战派的围攻,反战倡导者应优先支持达成持久的冲突解决方案。最终,保罗重申,开国元勋们关于战争需经国会批准的要求,对于防止此类不必要且代价高昂的干预仍然至关重要。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Ron Paul

Against the odds, the Memorandum of Understanding signed by the US and Iran appears to be holding, after threats and counter-threats. It may collapse, but it has survived a first round of talks between the two sides in Switzerland over the weekend.

President Trump started a war on Iran against all sober guidance and in violation of the US Constitution's requirement that only Congress can declare war. There must be a reckoning for our elected leaders who violate their oath of office, the Constitution, and simple common sense.

However, what is more telling is the reaction when President Trump finally took the correct move and attempted to end the war. The neocons who had hailed him as a great leader – Levin, Bolton, Pompeo, etc. – suddenly turned against him when he turned against further escalation of the war.

via CNN

Even Trump’s top funder, Miriam Adelson, attacked Trump in her newspaper Israel Hayom. "You could have been the greatest president of all, but you failed," the newspaper wrote in an editorial.

Not much gratitude from the Israel-first crowd, even if the war was started to benefit Israel.

And more telling even than this was the reaction of the "opposition" party in Congress, the Democrats. They attacked him harder for ending – or at least pausing – the war more than for starting the war in the first place!

Sen. Adam Schiff (D-CA) called the MOU a "capitulation." Sen Chris Murphy (D-CT) called the MOU an "embarrassing document." Sen. Amy Klobuchar falsely claimed that President Trump was paying Iran $300 billion to re-open Hormuz.

This is more evidence – as if any is needed – that our foreign policy is run by the "uniparty." When it comes to wars, there is no Republican Party nor is there a Democratic Party. There is only the "yes!" party.

Congress remains silent in the run-up to war. Congress remains silent when the President launches a war. Congress even remains silent when the war begins going badly. It is only on those rare occasions that a president takes steps to correct his mistake that Congress finds its voice.

Yes, there is plenty to criticize. After weekend talks, the US side, led by Vice President JD Vance, is celebrating as a "breakthrough" that the Strait of Hormuz is open again and that Iran has reportedly agreed to the return of UN inspectors. But the Strait was open before this war and UN inspectors were in Iran before President Trump unilaterally pulled out of the JCPOA "Iran Deal" in his first term.

The only difference now is that we burned through likely several hundred billion dollars, we lost dozens of aircraft and other military equipment, and we likely lost more service members than the Pentagon is admitting.

It is a reminder of why the Founders intended to make sure that any war must be declared by the people’' Representatives before the first bullet is shot: it should be very hard to launch wars.

Nevertheless, those who are truly against the wars should, in my opinion, hold their fire for the time being in hope that a lasting resolution can be found. The President is being attacked from all sides by the war party. Now may not be the best time for the peace party to join in.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com