拜登任命的法官斯帕克·苏克纳南(Sparkle Sooknanan)阻止了特朗普政府的《拯救法案》(SAVE Act)数据库。
Biden Judge Sparkle Sooknanan Blocks Trump Admin SAVE Act Database

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/biden-judge-sparkle-sooknanan-blocks-trump-admin-save-act-database

联邦法官斯帕克尔·苏克南(Sparkle Sooknanan)阻止了特朗普政府建立联邦“州公民身份名单”的倡议,裁定该计划违反了《社会保障法》、《隐私法》和《行政程序法》。 特朗普政府的行政令指示各机构汇总公民身份数据(包括社会保障记录和国土安全部记录),以核实选民资格。由拜登任命的苏克南法官谴责了该项目,指出政府“草率地合并”了不可靠的数据,导致美国公民被错误地从选民名册中除名。她强调,该计划侵犯了公民的隐私权,并威胁到选举程序的公正性。 这一有利于妇女选民联盟(League of Women Voters)的裁决,被投票权倡导者誉为防止非法清除选民的重要保护措施。相反,特朗普政府及其支持者批评了这一决定。国土安全部总法律顾问詹姆斯·珀西瓦尔(James Percival)在社交媒体上谴责了该裁决,认为法院阻碍了解决非公民投票担忧的必要工作。

相关文章

原文

A Biden-appointed federal judge - who quit her previous job as partner at the Jones Day law firm because they did work for the 1st Trump administration - just ruled against the administration's plan to create a database to verify citizenship to be able to vote in US elections. 

Judge Sparkle Sooknanan ruled on Monday that officials across several government agencies "haphazardly combined and repurposed the private information of millions of Americans, including citizenship data that they knew to be unreliable," in order to comply with the Trump administration's attempts to implement election integrity measures. 

A March executive order directed the Social Security Administration (SSA) to create a “State Citizenship List” derived from its data, naturalization records and the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) database, an existing database maintained by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that is used to determine eligibility for federal programs.

Since the EO, said Sooknanan, "states have partnered with the federal government to access the database and are actively removing United States citizens from voter rolls based on inaccurate information," she wrote in her 75-page ruling

"All in all, the federal government has knowingly trampled on the privacy rights of American citizens in a manner that threatens the sacred right to vote. This Court cannot stand idly by while that happens," she continued. 

According to Sooknanan - ruling in favor of the League of Women voters, efforts to establish the database were unlawful - and violated the Social Security Act, Privacy Act and Administrative Procedure Act.

Reacting to the ruling, far-left organization Democracy Now wrote "This protects millions from baseless investigations and unlawful voter roll purges – a critical win for voting rights." 

Meanwhile, DHS general counsel James Percival said on X: "t’s amazing how hard the Left will fight to stop us from solving problems they insist do not exist. Judge Sparkle Soknanan’s latest ruling preventing DHS from addressing alien voting is just the latest example." 

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com