The recent removal of licensed movies from PlayStation users' digital libraries has sparked intense debate on Hacker News regarding digital ownership. Users are frustrated that Sony markets content as a "purchase"—often priced significantly higher than a rental—while maintaining the right to revoke access at any time via "leaky" EULA language. Key points from the discussion include: * **Deceptive Marketing:** Critics argue that using the word "buy" implies permanent ownership. Many suggest that if companies retain the right to delete content, these transactions should legally be labeled as "leases" or "subleasing." * **Lack of Recourse:** There is broad consensus that governments have failed to protect consumers, allowing corporations to effectively perform "theft" by taking back paid-for goods without refunds. * **The Case for Piracy:** Many users view the instability of digital platforms as a primary driver for piracy. Some advocate for "buying" physical media or ripping files to personal servers (like Jellyfin) to ensure long-term, autonomous access. * **Systemic Failure:** Commenters argue that current licensing models are fundamentally anti-consumer, and that companies should be legally required to provide compensation, DRM-free downloads, or grandfathered access when content is pulled.