参议员发现:杰克·史密斯团队泄露机密材料
Jack Smith's Team Exposed Classified Materials, Senator Finds

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/jack-smiths-team-exposed-classified-materials-senator-finds

参议员查克·格拉斯利(Chuck Grassley)指控前特别检察官杰克·史密斯(Jack Smith)的团队处理机密信息不当,并援引了2024年的内部通讯记录。据报道,这些信息显示该团队曾将安全设施彻夜处于未锁状态,并在未经核实权限的情况下,将敏感材料提供给他人。 格拉斯利批评这些所谓的安全疏忽是虚伪的,并指出这些事件发生时,史密斯的团队正因唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)涉嫌不当处理机密文件一事对其进行起诉。格拉斯利认为这些行为体现了“司法双重标准”,并要求司法部(DOJ)对此进行深入调查并提供更多记录。 司法部对此回应称,该部门高度重视机密信息的保护工作,并会通过既定的内部程序对所有安全疏忽进行审查,以确定是否存在违规行为。史密斯对特朗普的起诉(其中包括与选举相关的指控)在特朗普赢得2024年总统大选后已被撤销。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times,

Prosecutors with the office of former special counsel Jack Smith left classified materials unsecured and provided materials to at least one person without confirming that person needed to see them, a senator said on July 8.

A set of messages from Smith’s team showed that in 2024, the team left a facility designated for the review of sensitive information open overnight, and potentially longer.

“Who opened the [facility] yesterday?” one member of the team asked in a message.

“No one opened it yesterday because no one closed it the day before,” another member replied.

A second set of messages from 2024 outlined how the team provided classified materials to an unidentified person despite not having confirmation that the person needed to see the materials.

The incidents took place as Smith’s team, which was part of the Department of Justice (DOJ), was prosecuting then-presidential candidate and former President Donald Trump for allegedly mishandling classified materials during his first term as president.

“Talk about the pot calling the kettle black,” Grassley said in a statement.

“According to these messages, Biden DOJ personnel may have committed the very offense for which Jack Smith was prosecuting President Trump. These records expose yet another double standard of justice.”

Grassley also wrote in a post on X that the messages “indicate hypocritical [and] careless behavior” and “merit further investigation.”

He pointed to how some former officials, such as former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, mishandled classified information but were not charged.

Grassley asked Todd Blanche, the acting attorney general, for more records, including whether the facility that was left unlocked contained any material that was part of Smith’s prosecution of Trump, and whether the DOJ investigated Smith’s team for giving classified information without the need-to-know confirmation.

“The Department is aware of the concerns raised in Senator Grassley’s letter and takes the safeguarding of classified information very seriously. Every official entrusted with sensitive materials must follow strict security protocols without exception — a standard Jack Smith’s team apparently failed to meet as they pursued a politically weaponized prosecution of President Trump,” a DOJ spokesperson told The Epoch Times in an email.

“As with any alleged security lapse, the Department reviews such matters through established internal processes to determine whether protocols were followed, whether classified information was compromised, and whether any corrective steps are warranted. The Department will continue to apply those procedures rigorously, consistent with our longstanding commitment to protecting national security and maintaining the integrity of our operations.”

Smith, who has said his investigation was proper, was appointed in November 2022 by then-Attorney General Merrick Garland to manage investigations into Trump, who at the time was out of office.

Federal prosecutors later charged Trump with violations of federal law governing the handling of classified information, as well as other charges such as illegally interfering in the 2020 presidential election.

Prosecutors dropped the cases after Trump won the 2024 election, noting that he would soon be president.

Part of Smith’s final report was released to the public prior to the start of Trump’s second term, outlining how Smith believed the evidence against Trump would have resulted in a conviction. A federal judge later ruled that the other part shall never be made public.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com