纽约市将成为全美首个禁止欺骗性订阅行为的城市
New York City to become first in US to ban deceptive subscription practices

原始链接: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/10/new-york-city-deceptive-subscriptions-ban

纽约市正采取强硬措施打击掠夺性企业行为,通过实施针对“订阅陷阱”和“垃圾费用”的新保护条例。自10月1日起,企业必须为循环订阅服务提供简便的取消流程;如不遵守,每位用户最高可面临525美元的罚款及其他处罚。 此外,该市还提议实施一项新规,要求企业在广告中预先标明商品和服务的“全包”总价。此举明确指向住房市场和酒店业中的隐性成本,目前这些行业中强制性的附加费用推高了租房者和旅客的支出。 消费者与劳工保护局局长塞缪尔·莱文认为,这些措施旨在遏制长达四十年的欺骗性定价行为,这种行为让企业得以隐瞒真实成本,而非公平竞争。尽管行业组织历来游说反对此类监管,但纽约市官员认为,这些变革对于解决该市的负担能力危机至关重要。如果“垃圾费用”规则最终敲定,有望在今年年底前生效,每年可为纽约市民节省数百万美元,并为消费者透明度树立新标准。

纽约市即将成为美国第一个禁止欺骗性订阅行为的城市,旨在打击隐藏费用和取消流程困难等掠夺性手段。 这一消息在 Hacker News 上引发了关于此类立法有效性的热烈讨论。用户对常见的行业“黑暗模式”表示不满,特别是那些利用误导性试用期诱导用户,随后自动转为昂贵年度订阅的应用程序。 辩论的很大一部分集中在法律的执行和适用范围上。一些评论者将其与加州的类似立法进行了对比,质疑纽约市的法规是否会存在漏洞,或者是否会因行业游说而受到削弱。虽然一些怀疑论者担心该法律可能缺乏“强制力”或面临联邦优先权的挑战,但另一些人则希望它能遏制不诚实的广告行为,例如将年度一次性付款标注为更便宜的月费率。总体而言,参与者讨论了此举是否能有效针对健身房和订阅服务等最恶劣的违规者,同时也指出了一些繁琐的官僚障碍可能会影响当地企业运营的潜在风险。
相关文章

原文

New York City has adopted a new rule that bans companies from using deceptive subscriptions to trap customers into paying for gym memberships, streaming services and other recurring charges, the city’s consumer protection office said.

The new rule, which will start on 1 October, promises hefty fines and aggressive enforcement for violators. Companies that do not provide a simple way to cancel could pay $525 per user subscription, back fees and additional fines.

The city is also targeting so-called “junk fees” that raise the final price of everything from apartments to sporting events, with a proposed rule that requires sellers to “advertise the total price for any good or service, including all mandatory additional charges and fees, up front”, according to a release shared with the Guardian.

New York would be the first US city to implement such a ban.

“People shouldn’t have to wait on hold for half an hour or send a certified letter or show up to a store in person in order to cancel” a subscription, said Samuel AA Levine, the city’s commissioner of consumer and worker protection, in an interview.

The new measures are expected to be announced in a press conference on Friday morning.

The proposed fee rule could have an especially wide impact, sending ripples through New York’s expensive housing market, where about 70% of residents rent.

Apartment renters in the US face a rising tide of add-on fees such as “boiler management” and “lifestyle” charges from management companies, which make true rental costs hundreds of dollars higher than the price stated on real-estate company websites.

If the proposed renters rule passes after public comment and hearing, any mandatory fees, including annual ones, would need to be included in the stated monthly rental price, Levine said.

The current situation creates “a scenario where rather than competing on price, companies are competing on their ability to hide the true price. That’s the worst kind of incentive” – and one that deeply distorts the market, Levine said.

The moves are part of an aggressive push by Zohran Mamdani and Levine, a former head of consumer protection in the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), to rein in what they see as predatory corporate malpractice nationwide.

“In the dawn of the [Ronald] Reagan era, the FTC and others in Washington said expressly that … markets could correct themselves, regulate themselves, they were going to stop writing rules,” and allow companies to police their own behavior, Levine said. “What it has gotten us is 40 years of deceptive pricing,” he said.

Bans on junk fees and subscription traps are generally popular with consumers, but have been fought aggressively by industry groups. When the Biden administration introduced a junk fee rule in 2024, the US Chamber of Commerce argued it was “an attempt to micromanage businesses’ pricing structures”, and apartment fees were cut from that federal rule after lobbying by the real-estate industry.

A national click-to-cancel rule introduced by the Biden administration was struck down by a federal judge in 2025, days before it was set to go into effect, over a procedural rule. Donald Trump’s FTC plans to pass a similar rule in coming months.

Companies make billions a year in automatic subscription renewals that consumers do not want or do not know they have. The subscription rule could save New Yorkers alone as much as $162.5m per year, the Roosevelt Institute thinktank estimates.

While the subscription rule would only apply to New York City residents, the proposed junk fee rule affects companies such as hotels and rental car agencies that cater to visitors. If you are staying in a hotel in the city that hits you with undisclosed fees upon check-in, “you should complain to us”, Levine said.

The new rule is the Mamdani administration’s latest attempt to address the affordability crisis after heavily campaigning on making the city cheaper for residents. Members of Mamdani’s democratic socialist group that were endorsed by the mayor won a flurry of primary elections in recent weeks, as some voters embrace leftwing populism that promises to empower working-class Americans, similar to pledges by Trump in the past three presidential elections.

The New York city council has also proposed a rule banning “surveillance pricing”, in which companies charge consumers different prices for the same good or service, based on algorithmic information from their spending and other personal habits.

Maryland banned the practice in April. Colorado’s governor vetoed a ban last month.

The city will take public comments on the junk fee rule and then hold a hearing, Levine said. “I certainly hope that we can get this rule done by the end of the year.”

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com