OpenAI 在欧盟法院的商标权纠纷中败诉
OpenAI loses trademark dispute at EU court

原始链接: https://dpa-international.com/economics/urn:newsml:dpa.com:20090101:260715-930-389143/

欧盟普通法院驳回了 OpenAI 注册“OPENAI”商标的申请,维持了欧盟知识产权局(EUIPO)的原判。法院裁定,该术语纯属描述性词汇,因为公众会将“OPENAI”理解为可自由访问的软件或人工智能。 OpenAI 曾辩称该名称是一个独特的自造词,并列举了在其他 30 多个国家获得的商标批准作为支撑。然而,法院驳回了这些论点,指出该词组在语言学上属于标准用法,且国际先例在欧盟法律下不具备约束力。因此,该公司未能证明其软件和云计算服务在欧盟范围内获得商标保护所需的显著性。OpenAI 仍有权就此裁决向欧洲法院提起上诉。

Hacker News 最新 | 往日 | 评论 | 提问 | 展示 | 招聘 | 提交 登录 OpenAI 在欧盟法院商标纠纷中败诉 (dpa-international.com) 17 分,hermanzegerman 发布于 1 小时前 | 隐藏 | 往日 | 收藏 | 1 条评论 帮助 zkmon 5 分钟前 [–] 终于有人问了些明智的问题,关于“开源”(open)一词被劫持的现象。 回复 考虑申请 YC 2026 年秋季批次!申请截止日期为 7 月 27 日。 指导原则 | 常见问题 | 列表 | API | 安全 | 法律 | 申请 YC | 联系方式 搜索:
相关文章

原文

OpenAI, the US company behind ChatGPT, has lost its legal challenge against the refusal to register the trademark "OPENAI" at the European Union's General Court.

The Luxembourg-based court ruled that, for certain software and information technology goods and services, the term is purely descriptive and therefore lacks the distinctiveness required for trademark protection. The ruling can still be appealed to the European Court of Justice.

The court's judgment upheld a decision by the EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). The office had partially rejected OpenAI's application for trademark registration, for example in relation to software and cloud computing services.

The EUIPO found that the word "open" would be understood by the relevant public as meaning freely accessible, while the combination with "AI" (artificial intelligence) would be interpreted as referring to products based on openly accessible artificial intelligence.

OpenAI had argued that the word "open" has multiple possible meanings and that "OPENAI" is a coined term without a fixed meaning. The company also cited comparable trademark registrations previously granted by the EUIPO and registrations in more than 30 other countries, including the United Kingdom and Singapore.

The court rejected these arguments. It ruled that the combination of words was not an unusual linguistic combination in English. Furthermore, registrations in other jurisdictions were not binding under EU trademark law.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com