古罗马版的谷歌地图:去海边要走多久
Ancient Rome's version of Google Maps: how long to reach the beach

原始链接: https://www.euronews.com/culture/2026/07/02/ancient-romes-version-of-google-maps-how-long-to-reach-the-beach

荷兰工程师勒内·沃尔堡(René Voorburg)推出了一个名为 **OmnesViae** (Omnesviae.org) 的交互式开放获取数字工具,用于重建古罗马的道路网络。该平台利用《波伊廷格地图》(Tabula Peutingeriana)、《安敦尼游记》(Antonine Itinerary)以及“昴宿星计划”(Pleiades Project)的数据,允许用户规划罗马帝国各城市之间的路线,并根据历史距离计算步行或骑马的旅行时间。 其用户友好的界面在现代地图上显示路径,识别了现代地名对应的古代称呼,并详细列出了中间站点。例如,从马德里(Miaccum)到米兰(Mediolanvm)的旅程预计需要 43 天。 近期,该项目完成了代码重写,并集成了用于翻译和插图的 AI 技术。OmnesViae 加入了日益增长的数字历史项目行列,致力于绘制古代世界的物流交通图。该项目的代码和数据库通过 Codeberg 完全开放,为历史学家和爱好者提供了一个宝贵的资源,让他们能通过现代数字视角探索古罗马帝国的官方基础设施——罗马驿道系统(cursus publicus)。

这篇 Hacker News 讨论批评了一篇将现代旅行时间与古罗马时期进行对比的文章,该文章使用了名为“OmnesViae”的路线规划工具。 评论者迅速反驳了原文中关于“1500 英里旅程需要 43 天,而现代步行只需 14 天”的说法。他们指出,步行速度本身并没有改变,产生差距的原因在于该古罗马工具考虑了每天 8 小时的合理步行时间,而现代软件通常假设是持续行进。 讨论随后演变为一场关于现代西方人与古罗马人谁更有能力完成此类长途跋涉的争论。一些人认为现代装备(鞋履、补水、营养)具有明显优势,而另一些人则认为习惯赤脚行走的古罗马人拥有更强的长途耐力。讨论还强调了理论地图中常被忽略的实际变量,例如季节性天气限制(如冬季穿越阿尔卑斯山)和地区局势的不稳定性。最后,用户指出《普丁格地图》(Tabula Peutingeriana)是这些数字版罗马旅行路线重建的历史基础。
相关文章

原文

Published on Updated

A Dutch engineer has reconstructed, with the help of academic sources and ancient cartography, the road map that linked up the Roman Empire. The result, accessible from any browser, including on mobile phones, allows users to plot routes between cities of Antiquity and find out how many days the journey would have taken on foot or on horseback.

The tool is called OmnesViae (Omnesviae.org (source in Spanish)) and is based mainly on the Tabula Peutingeriana, a medieval copy of a Roman map that depicted the cursus publicus, the Empire’s official road network.

As the western part of that document has been lost, the data for that area come from the Antonine Itinerary, another record from the Roman era. Behind the project is René Voorburg (source in Spanish), who drew on the work of historian Richard Talbert on the Tabula (source in Spanish) and on the location data from the Pleiades Project. The code and database are open access and can be consulted on Codeberg.

How it works and what it shows

The site is designed for use on a computer, but it also responds well in a phone browser. You just need to enter a starting point and a destination for the system to calculate the fastest route according to the distances recorded in ancient sources, and highlight it in yellow on a modern map.

It also provides detailed information on intermediate stops, which is particularly useful because many Roman roads followed river courses or passed close to settlements that still exist today, albeit under different names.

When Madrid and Milan are entered as the destination, the site identifies them as Miaccum and Mediolanvm, and marks Conplutum, today’s Alcalá de Henares, as the first major stop. Among the final stages are Avgvsta Tavrinorvm (Turin) and Placentia (Piacenza).

According to the planner’s calculation, the journey would have taken 43 days to cover 1,500 Roman miles. To put that into a contemporary context: the same route by road today can be completed in 14 days (340 hours) on foot, or 16 hours by car (source in Spanish).

A project that is still growing

OmnesViae is not the only initiative that seeks to reconstruct the communications map of the Roman world. In recent years, other projects with similar approaches have emerged, some focused on calculating travel costs and times depending on the time of year, and others aimed at documenting the physical layout of the roads more precisely using digital mapping techniques.

Voorburg keeps his tool updated and has completely rewritten the original version, which was active between 2011 and 2024, now incorporating artificial intelligence support for translations and the illustrations on the site.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com