欧盟法院在关于版权的里程碑式裁决中表示:“VPN 是合法的技术工具。”
'VPNs are lawful technical tools,' says EU Court in landmark copyright ruling

原始链接: https://remysharp.com/links/2026-07-23-35890312

我一直关注着围绕“儿童保护”的相关报道,因为一方面它确实为儿童提供了一些保护,但另一方面它也严重侵犯了所有人的隐私——比如成年人为了证明自己不是儿童而不得不交出个人隐私。英国政府一直想封禁 VPN,这在坊间流传已久(但缺乏确切证据!),所以这篇文章显得尤为引人注目:欧盟法院裁定,出版商和 VPN 提供商不对版权侵权负责;地理封锁是版权所有者的问题,而非 VPN 的责任。服务提供商无需为用户绕过限制的行为承担法律责任。希望这能为英国政府划下一道明确的界限,但谁又真能猜透他们心里在想什么呢!

Sorry.
相关文章

原文

I've been following the stories around the "child protection" because on one hand it does afford children some protection, but it also hammers down on the privacy of everyone - i.e. adults who give up their privacy to prove they're not a child.

VPNs in particular have been tossed around as something that the UK government would like to ban (citation needed/lacking!), which is why this article is particularly interesting:

The Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled that publishers and VPN providers aren't liable for copyright infringement

Geo-blocking is the copyright holder's problem, not the VPN's. Providers are not liable for users bypassing restrictions

Hopefully this draws a simple line in the sand for the UK government, and yet, who really knows what's going through their head at any one time!

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com